* Nice Places vs. Lousy Places: Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams follow two news stories to their inevitable conclusion: biblical creationism leads to life and anything less leads to death. And in another classic RSR segment, the guys read off a list (just below) of nice places to live, and of lousy places to live, based on population density.

* World Mag & Christian Examiner Reports: In addition to the Huffington Post infanticide article we mentioned on air, after showtime today, we found out that Bob was quoted by the Christian Examiner in their Home Depot article about an employee admonishing the company for promoting homosexuality, and that Enyart was quoted in World magazine's report on the Longmont, Colorado criminal who ripped a baby from her young mother's womb and kidnapped the child. 

Is the World Overpopulated?
by Bob Enyart 

Six people just survived the sinking of an ocean vessel. They are afloat in a lifeboat with only enough water for five. On board are a doctor, a carpenter, a nurse, a blind elderly woman, a sailor, and a counselor.

Public school students given this scenario over the years were then asked, "Who should be thrown overboard?" Environmentalists designed this exercise to teach public students to solve problems by "eliminating" excess people.

Jacques Cousteau said, "to stabilize the world population we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say," he admitted, "but it’s just as bad not to say it." This Hitlerian sentiment, published in UNESCO Courier in November 1991, is not rare among envirochondriacs.

Britain’s Prince Philip, president of the Worldwide Fund for Nature, is quoted by The New American’s Robert Lee, Sept. 5, 1994 saying that he would like to be reincarnated as a "killer virus to lower human population levels." Prince HIVlip, perhaps?

How does anyone know there is only enough water for five? Utterly discredited, yet an authority to liberals, is Population Bomb author Paul Ehrlich, who has apparently not had a single prediction come true. America, he declared: would have widespread food rationing by the late 70s, would be "literally dying of thirst" by 1984, and would have 65 million famine deaths in the 80s. [See more politically correct predictions.]

* To Distract from a Planet that Shouldn't Exist: Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams finally get around to enjoying the first 2015 issue of Creation magazine. Anti-creationists have long claimed that if you have water, you'll get life. Now, to distract the public from yet another exoplanet discovery that falsifies the secular planetary nebulae hypothesis, they're claiming that if you have rocks (like on this newly discovered planet), you'll get life.

* As the Universal Solvent Water Isn't a Friend But an Enemy to Abiogenesis: As for water, it's the universal solvent, so while it is necessary to sustain existing life, it would dissolve prebiotic chemicals including amino acids and polymers. And a rock, is a rock, is a rock. So even if it lacked the hydro-enemy of abiogenesis, rocks also lack information. For while information is needed to build any biological system and any rudimentary genetic encoding scheme, unlike rock, information itself is not physical. The bottom line though is that this new discovery is simply piling on to what had already been known. From RSR's Planet Formation Theory Decimated program:

The California Institute of Technology manager of NASA's exoplanet database, Caltech's astronomer Mike Brown, stated: “Before we ever discovered any [planets outside the solar system] we thought we understood the formation of planetary systems pretty deeply… It was a really beautiful theory. And, clearly, thoroughly wrong." 

* Creation Science Hall of Fame, and Other Fun Topics: The guys also discuss:
- the Creation Science Hall of Fame
- scientists stunned yet again by the retina's wiring
- good ole' fashioned tar (maybe real, real, really-old fashioned tar)
- the awesome patterns of evidence for the Jewish patriarchs living in Egypt, and that
- the genius of ancient man enabled the pyramid makers to move massive stones.

Today's Resource: If you enjoy Real Science Radio, we need your help to stay on the air! Please purchase one of our science resources, or make a one-time or monthly donation to RSR!
- Browse through our Science Department in the KGOV Store
- Check out our best-selling Global Flood and Hydroplate Theory video
- Donate at rsr.org/donate by way of our KGOV donation page
- Call us at 1-800-8Enyart (836-9278) to help us stay on the air!

* Mental Floss: Dr. Ed Boudreaux, president of the Rocky Mountain Creation Fellowship, joins Real Science Radio host Fred Wiliams in studio to talk about the memo a lot of good folks failed to get, like those in the blizzard-riddled North East and the Coloradans who just endured a 103-year record-breaking snowfall. Memo: We're in the midst of man-made global warming! Oh wait, it's now called "Climate Change". Other fun topics include the Pope apparently missing RSR's List of Evidence Against the Big Bang, and another "missing link" (more like missing teeth), and the origin of shaking hands to pass on odors as a signal. (Huh?)

* Australian Scientist John Hartnett evaluates RSR's Evidence Against the Big Bang: As a college professor, a cosmologist, and an award-winning physicist co-creator of the most precise clock ever made by human beings, Dr. Hartnett is qualified to evaluate the validity of RSR's list of peer-reviewed scientific discoveries that contradict, even as admitted by their discoverers, the predictions of the big bang theory. Discussed: distant "mature" galaxies; missing antimatter; "too perfect" spirals; nine billion years of missing metal; Sun missing 99% of its expected spin; etc.

* Following Dr. Hartnett & His Work at CMI: Here at Real Science Radio we keep up with the latest in the the rough-and-tumble field of cosmology by following JohnHartnett.org and Dr. Hartnett's articles at creation.com.   

* Australian Scientist John Hartnett evaluates RSR's Evidence Against the Big Bang: As a college professor, a cosmologist, and an award-winning physicist co-creator of the most precise clock ever made by human beings, Dr. Hartnett is qualified to evaluate the validity of RSR's list of peer-reviewed scientific discoveries that contradict, even as admitted by their discoverers, the predictions of the big bang theory. Discussed: distant "mature" galaxies; missing antimatter; "too perfect" spirals; nine billion years of missing metal; Sun missing 99% of its expected spin; etc.

* Following Dr. Hartnett & His Work at CMI: Here at Real Science Radio we keep up with the latest in the the rough-and-tumble field of cosmology by following JohnHartnett.org and Dr. Hartnett's articles at creation.com.  And you just might love listening to our rsr.org/expansion-of-space interview with Dr. Hartnett! 

* Can You Know a House Had a Builder? Creation organizations attempt to diminish "historical" science as compared to "observational" science. That claim, at odds with the overwhelming success of forensic science, comes awfully close to the false materialist claim that you can only really know what your five senses tell you. Question: Can you have a certainty that a house had a builder, even if you did not see it being built? Yes. (See Hebrews 3:4.) For, if you cannot trust your mind to ascertain many things that absolutely have happened in the past, then neither could you trust your eyes about what is happening in the present.

* Arguments Creationists Should Not Use: We recommend that you not use the argument that historical science has less validity as compared to observational science. As a Real Science Radio listener says, Answers in Genesis shouldn't pull the rug out from their own signature flood observation. "It is historical science—in action— to understand Ken Ham's point about billions of dead things, buried in rock layers, laid down by water, all over the earth."

* Reporters/Bloggers Claim Ham & Sarfati Reject Historical Science: Jonathan Sarfati posted on Facebook this week that a friendly reporter overstated her case. For Dr. Sarfati does not reject historical science, but draws a distinction between it and observational science. Also this week Ken Ham argued that his opponents misunderstand the difference between historical and observational science. On today's program, however, RSR hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams argue against the qualitative distinctions that many creationists draw between these scientific disciplines. 

Creation Movement Wrong on Historical Science

Does the creation.com article CSI and evolution use good argumentation or poor and arbitrary evidence to justify its claim of a qualitative distinction between observational and historical science? At Real Science Radio, we suggest that the creation movement generally, and in particular the article’s publisher, Creation Ministries International, and Answers in Genesis and Ken Ham in his debate with Bill Nye, err in their effort to diminish forensic science of the past as compared to the science of ongoing processes. [Update: A listener let us kinow that CMI revised their article and kindly mentioned that was prompted by this RSR critque.]

* RSR Addresses Some Absolutes: Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams air audio of evolutionist Richard Dawkins advocating infanticide in the killing of handicapped newborns and toddlers. The guys express their moral outrage and show how widespread this horrific evolutionary development has become. Then, going back two decades into the Bob Enyart Live archives, the guys aired a clip about the killing of two eagle eggs which outraged a couple of pro-choice callers. Update: The Denver section of the Huffington Post quoted "Denver talk-radio host" Bob Enyart saying: "An increasing number of well-known leaders and organizations who are pro-choice are also coming out publicly in favor of killing children, not only before they are born, but also after they are born." The Huffington Post then linked to the same American Right To Life article that RSR had presented, "Pro-Choicers" Who Want to Legalize Infanticide.

* Another Confirmed Prediction from Creationist Walt Brown: Regarding the confirmation of yet another astounding science prediction, Bob Enyart interviews Dr. Walt Brown, author of the hydroplate theory explanation of the global flood and the many resulting broken features of our Earth and solar system. The European Space Agency has just released high-resolution images of Comet 67P along with the assessment of their scientists that they may have found unexpectedly large rounded boulders (up to 10-feet in diameter) that may be the comet's building blocks! This interview presents this latest discovery which, though it has shocked so many secular astronomers, has confirmed Walt Brown's specific prediction, published 13 years ago in the 7th Edition of his book In the Beginning, about the composition of comets. See more at rsr.org/comets, rsr.org/predictions, rsr.org/solar-system, and you may want to investigate also the Itokawa asteroid.

* RSR Volunteer Needed: RSR needs a transcript of the JPG image of John Buchanan's 1905 Letter to the Editor that's over at rsr.org/john-buchanan. If you will do this for us, please then email your transcript to Bob@rsr.org. Thank you! -The RSR Crew. DONE. Thank you RSR listeners! 

* Today's Resources: Check out RSR's Global Flood & Hydroplate Theory video (on DVD, Blu-ray, or download). And you can enjoy the 6-disc standard audio CD set The Hydroplate Theory & Dr. Walt Brown on the Air or get the entire set on a single MP3 CD, both of which contain eleven radio programs. Bob Enyart also highly recommends Dr. Walt Brown's fabulous book, In the Beginning! Order by clicking the link, or calling us at 800-8Enyart (800 836-9278)!

And come on out to the RSR Big Bang Seminar in Indy on March 7th!

* Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Darwin: Real Science Radio host Bob Enyart interviews science historian professor Michael Flannery on the two fathers of evolution theory and natural selection, Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Darwin. To reinforce current scientific dogma, most or all attention is typically given to Darwin with Wallace’ role downplayed because he rejected Darwin’s methodological naturalism, showing that rejection of materialism is not a science stopper. See also our 2018 sequel, rsr.org/wallace-2.

* Darwin Systematically Failed to Credit Other Scientists: For the documentation showing that Charles Darwin "borrowed", or more accurately, plagiarized, other scientists to popularize the significant aspects of "Darwinism", please see creation.com/darwin-plagiarism.

* Evolutionary Naturalism is an Ancient Idea: RSR friend Dr. Jerry Bergman presents a great review of the pre-Darwin ancient beliefs in naturalistic origin of species. Most evolutionists will be shocked to learn the historical information, documented in Bergman's paper, that corroborates the strongest claim, bolded here, in his abstract:

The theory of biological evolution is not a modern idea as is often supposed. Organic evolution was first taught by the Greeks at least as early as the 7th century BC. Greek philosophers probably borrowed and adapted their evolutionary ideas from the Hindus, who believed that souls transformed from one animal to another until they reached a perfection state called nirvana. Charles Darwin allegedly made no contributions to the development of the theory of evolution by natural selection, but simply helped to popularize it. Evolutionists today argue that evolution is a modern idea (i.e. a product of scientific research), in part as an effort to lend credibility to their worldview.

* Darwin on the 10-pound British Note: The British people love Darwin because they hate God. (See rsr.org/darwin.)

Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams discuss the great article by Don Batten in a recent issue of Creation magazine titled Creationist Contributions to Science. As reported in the same Fall 2014 issue, the guys also chat about the evolution professor who went nuts on campus praising Darwin, the two additional canyons that geologists have admitted formed rapidly, and a so-called "primitive" single-celled organism actually operating by way of wildly complex quantum mechanical functions. :)  See also...

* RSR's Quantum Thoughts: See this list, maintained, at rsr.org/qm#resources.
- 2018: Quantum Biology Pt. 1: Doing what standard chemistry and physics can't
- 2019: QB Pt. 2: Our seemingly impossible sense of smell
- 2019: How Quantum Computers Do It: Finally, a Helpful Explanation
- 2019: Google's Quantum Supremacy
- 2019: Top Mathematicians: Ants & Bees, Mold & Amoebas
- 2018: Coincidence or Determinism? Quantum theology and physics
- 2015: RSR broaches QM (this program)
- 2020: Bob's draft paper rsr.org/wave-particle-duality-is-a-triality.