From "all of them" to We Are Paul Revere's grandstands

First we mention yesterday's "How many Afghan jihadis would you kill to protect one woman?" Then we hear Matt Walsh wonderfully blast a school board, bringing Carrie Underwood out of the closet as an anti-masker! And the show closes with Bob's discussion of the brilliant page run by Brian Enyart and its dumber-than-rocks followers who kneejerk comment about a study documenting great harm to infants from the shutdown not even realizing that they are on the same side as the study. The Brown University infant mental health research compared those born during the lockdown to the results of tests for those born previously. The horrifying results fit with our and our List of 25 Ways the Shutdown Kills People, and otherwise harms them. The Guardian reports, "Children born during the coronavirus pandemic have significantly reduced verbal, motor and overall cognitive performance compared with children born before". In the decade preceding the pandemic, the mean IQ score on standardized tests for children aged between three months and three years of age hovered around 100 but for children born during the pandemic that number plummeted to 78. Said Deoni. "You don’t typically see things like that, outside of major cognitive disorders." The study included 672 children from the state of Rhode Island. Of these, 188 were born after July 2020 and 308 were born prior to January 2019, while 176 were born between January 2019 and March 2020. The children included in the study were born full-term, had no developmental disabilities and were mostly white. Those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds fared worse in the tests, the researchers found. The study points to other factors, but KGOV predicts that pregnant moms wearing masks at work, shopping, etc., caused long-term harm to their children. Starbucks, etc., obviously, didn't have the foresight to take care to not oxygen-deprive and carbon-dioxide poison the unborn children of their pregnant workers.