Bob Enyart Live https://kgov.com/ Daily conservative talk show hosted by American's most popular, self-proclaimed right-wing, religious fanatic. en God's Creation & Design in the Headlines https://kgov.com/bel/20241129 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 22:00:00 -0700 7077 at https://kgov.com <div><p>Join&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://evolutionfairytale.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1733010122683000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3cgB4FjjyUWkQOG3rBgNFY" href="https://evolutionfairytale.com/" target="_blank">Fred Williams</a>&nbsp;and co-host&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://theweeklyworldview.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1733010122683000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0Gyk1ho5wU-3e4zbo3Hhj9" href="https://theweeklyworldview.com/" target="_blank">Doug McBur</a><a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://theweeklyworldview.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1733010122683000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0Gyk1ho5wU-3e4zbo3Hhj9" href="https://theweeklyworldview.com/" target="_blank">ney</a>&nbsp;for the latest science news from the worlds&nbsp;of science and medicine from a biblical. creationist worldview.</p> <p><strong>*God Given Immunity:</strong>&nbsp;Hear about the potential for human&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-11-11-humans-latent-ability-regenerate-body-parts.html&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1733010122683000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3NVN88fB_tT5nQx6x7JHHE" href="https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-11-11-humans-latent-ability-regenerate-body-parts.html" target="_blank">regeneration</a>&nbsp;of organs and limbs. Check out Robert Metheny's work on&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3DIKbHaESUkpI&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1733010122683000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2eMgyd77LREV1YTYohxB-5" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKbHaESUkpI" target="_blank">regenerating cardiac</a>&nbsp;tissue, (and revisit this&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://kgov.com/molecular-biologist-anderson-on-dinosaur-soft-tissue-14c-and-targeted-antibodies&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1733010122683000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2SsXd6FIA27TpQtcVY-ZUV" href="https://kgov.com/molecular-biologist-anderson-on-dinosaur-soft-tissue-14c-and-targeted-antibodies" target="_blank">amazing interview</a>&nbsp;with Bob and Kevin Anderson).</p> <!--break--> <p><strong>*The Sky is Falling:</strong>&nbsp;Well, not yet. But the amount of space&nbsp;junk is of concern because what goes up must come down. So a&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.space.com/space-exploration/satellites/worlds-1st-wooden-satellite-arrives-at-iss-for-key-orbital-test&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1733010122683000&amp;usg=AOvVaw39P7FEpbdwnG9w4cuRJxw3" href="https://www.space.com/space-exploration/satellites/worlds-1st-wooden-satellite-arrives-at-iss-for-key-orbital-test" target="_blank">wooden satellite</a>&nbsp;might not be a bad idea.</p> <p><strong>*Monkey Business:</strong>&nbsp;Have you heard the one about all the monkeys on Earth&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c748kmvwyv9o&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1733010122683000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3rPNRnmVMCmCROLJLv81Vt" href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c748kmvwyv9o" target="_blank">typing out</a>&nbsp;Shakespeare? The math proves that it is, in fact a joke!</p> <p><strong>*Sealing up the&nbsp;Sum:&nbsp;</strong>Hear about ancient mesopotamian&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/the-worlds-earliest-writing-system-may-have-been-influenced-by-older-symbols-found-on-stone-cylinder-seals-180985406/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1733010122683000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3DJTma6pbL9ckCuxBaGOD3" href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/the-worlds-earliest-writing-system-may-have-been-influenced-by-older-symbols-found-on-stone-cylinder-seals-180985406/" target="_blank">cylinder seals</a>&nbsp;that feature images of men and dinosaurs together! (Hat&nbsp;tip to RSR's resident Creationist Curmudgeon).</p> <div class="video-embed-field-provider-youtube video-embed-field-responsive-video"><iframe width="854" height="480" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Wgbqfk-zkYc?autoplay=0&amp;start=0&amp;rel=0"></iframe> </div> </div> ThThurs: Revelation Pt. 15 https://kgov.com/bel/20241128 Thu, 28 Nov 2024 22:00:00 -0700 7075 at https://kgov.com <div><main role="main"> <article role="article"> <p><strong>* Revelation</strong>:&nbsp;The Book of Revelation vents God's final warning toward those who will not follow Him. Often clouded in mystery, this book has eluded the understanding of millions, and has been used as a pretext for many false prophets. Bob Enyart presents this conclusion of Scripture in light of the Bible's overview. This clear method of study helps to cut through much of the confusion regarding Revelation.<br /> <strong><strong><a advanced="[object Object]" anchor="[object Object]" email="[object Object]" href="http://store.kgov.com/revelation-vol-i-mp3-cd-or-mp3-download/" linktext="" target="[object Object]" type="url" url="[object Object]"><img alt="What We Believe and Why We Believe It" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="306" src="https://cdn3.bigcommerce.com/s-33mrizoy/products/142/images/388/Rev%252520Vol%252520I-Lg__65944.1412612112.1280.1280.jpg?c=2" width="306" /></a></strong></strong><br /> For over a quarter century Bob Enyart has studied God's Word praying for the wisdom to share the truth of Scripture with a lost and dying world. Now you can benefit from this very exciting Bible study. The two Revelation albums address matters of eternal consequence head on. Before listening to these tapes, Bob strongly urges that you read The&nbsp;<strong><a href="http://store.kgov.com/the-plot/">Plot book or listen to The Plot album</a></strong>&nbsp;that will introduce you to the overview of the Bible.&nbsp;Available on&nbsp;<a href="http://store.kgov.com/revelation-vol-i-mp3-cd-or-mp3-download/">MP3-CD or download</a>.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>BEL SUBSCRIPTIONS</strong>: Please consider one of our monthly subscriptions that will not only help support BEL, but they also promote better understanding of the Bible and may equip you to more effectively reach those around you.<br /> <br /> <a href="https://store.kgov.com/monthly-bible-study-sermon-topical-audio-and-video-downloads/" target="_blank"><strong>Monthly Audio &amp; Video&nbsp;Downloads</strong></a>: Now you can subscribe to monthly sermons, Bible studies or topical videos in download form.&nbsp;</p> <p><a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Sermons</strong></a>: Enjoy all of Bob's sermons from the month on&nbsp;Sermon Video DVD, great also to watch with the family. Or, get these on&nbsp;Sermon Audio CDs&nbsp;which are standard audio Compact Discs that will play on any CD player including the one in your car. Or get them on a single&nbsp;Sermon MP3-CD&nbsp;which will play on an MP3 player, in a DVD player, or in your computer.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Bible Studies</strong></a>: Enjoy the Scriptures with Bob's&nbsp;Monthly Bible Study DVDs, great too for a small group Bible study. Or get these teachings on a single&nbsp;Monthly Bible Study Audio MP3- CD which will play on an MP3 player, in a DVD player, or in your computer.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Topical Videos</strong></a>: Coming to your mailbox, you'll get a&nbsp;Monthly Topical DVD&nbsp;to enjoy one of Bob's great videos specially selected to be entertaining and to teach about life from a biblical worldview.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly BEL TV Classics</strong></a>: Enjoy Bob Enyart's timeless, popular TV show delivered to your home on the&nbsp;Monthly BEL TV Classics DVDs&nbsp;with great audio and video clarity thanks to our state-of-the-art mastering from the studio-quality Sony beta tapes to DVD!<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Donation</strong></a>: For folks who just want to make sure that Bob Enyart Live stays on the air, please consider making a pledge in the form of a&nbsp;Monthly Donation.</p> </article> </main> </div> JFK & the Art & Science of Conspiracy Theories https://kgov.com/kennedy-assassination Fri, 22 Nov 2024 22:00:00 -0700 7076 at https://kgov.com <div><p><b>*The CIA, Zapruder &amp; Geraldo Rivera:&nbsp;</b>Join&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://evolutionfairytale.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0BpELiM0DVXg1hv15XOFKl" href="https://evolutionfairytale.com/" target="_blank">Fred Williams</a>&nbsp;and co-host&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://theweeklyworldview.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw26icKzcZOn4AKRdvBmYtej" href="https://theweeklyworldview.com/" target="_blank">Doug McBurn</a><a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://theweeklyworldview.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw26icKzcZOn4AKRdvBmYtej" href="https://theweeklyworldview.com/" target="_blank">ey</a>&nbsp;as they examine the evidence for a lone gunman&nbsp;versus&nbsp;a conspiracy to assassinate JFK. (And First of all,&nbsp;<b>let's be clear!</b>&nbsp;the CIA says they&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp88-01315r000300510116-8&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw15QouVc_qRRfRFbJZW-cNt" href="https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp88-01315r000300510116-8" target="_blank">didn't</a>&nbsp;do it).</p> <p><b>*Primary Evidence:&nbsp;</b>Hear about how the&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://harveyandlee.net/DPDT/Transcripts.html&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2wiOsj80TrlLNWqy6h7_ZK" href="https://harveyandlee.net/DPDT/Transcripts.html" target="_blank">police found</a>&nbsp;the rifle, the shell casings and other evidence tying Lee Harvey Oswald to the assassination in the immediate aftermath.</p> <!--break--> <p><b>*The Warren Commission &amp; The Bipartisan House Select Committee on Assassinations:&nbsp;</b>Hear about the scientific&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/chapter-3.html%23:~:text%3Didentical%2520conclusions.147-,THE%2520BULLET%2520WOUNDS,found%2520on%2520November%252022%252C%25201963.&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0gYmp4ALJpp7-lS3nxmq0i" href="https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/chapter-3.html#:~:text=identical%20conclusions.147-,THE%20BULLET%20WOUNDS,found%20on%20November%2022%2C%201963." target="_blank">studies</a>&nbsp;that the governing officials&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/jfk-john-f-kennedy-assassination-bullet-analyses%23:~:text%3DFor%2520a%2520number%2520of%2520years,and%2520six%2520references%2520are%2520provided.&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0jfKmzDg_LRiF0cHo2k76C" href="https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/jfk-john-f-kennedy-assassination-bullet-analyses#:~:text=For%20a%20number%20of%20years,and%20six%20references%20are%20provided." target="_blank">commissioned</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/chapter-3.html%23:~:text%3Didentical%2520conclusions.147-,THE%2520BULLET%2520WOUNDS,found%2520on%2520November%252022%252C%25201963.&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0gYmp4ALJpp7-lS3nxmq0i" href="https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/chapter-3.html#:~:text=identical%20conclusions.147-,THE%20BULLET%20WOUNDS,found%20on%20November%2022%2C%201963." target="_blank">referred to</a>&nbsp;form their opinions, and&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.jfk-online.com/nas00.html&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3pkb-oR1JrhquPi6I7WSqs" href="https://www.jfk-online.com/nas00.html" target="_blank">other studies</a>,&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.newsweek.com/2014/11/28/truth-behind-jfks-assassination-285653.html&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0VVJeWgFN5WjPP9YocW_jw" href="https://www.newsweek.com/2014/11/28/truth-behind-jfks-assassination-285653.html" target="_blank">articles</a>, and&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2013/11/john-f-kennedy-conspiracy-theories-debunked-why-the-magic-bullet-and-grassy-knoll-dont-make-sense.html&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1HLNi_KOpBOQo2-OIqE1HV" href="https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2013/11/john-f-kennedy-conspiracy-theories-debunked-why-the-magic-bullet-and-grassy-knoll-dont-make-sense.html" target="_blank">reports</a>&nbsp;that either&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://today.tamu.edu/2017/12/07/two-shooters-texas-am-statistician-says-better-forensic-science-can-reveal-more-about-the-jfk-assassination/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3RXMtiCtb38N28eE5QZMiO" href="https://today.tamu.edu/2017/12/07/two-shooters-texas-am-statistician-says-better-forensic-science-can-reveal-more-about-the-jfk-assassination/" target="_blank">support</a>&nbsp;or refute the commission's findings.</p> <p><b>*The Acoustics &amp; the Wounds:</b>&nbsp;Acoustic&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://aarclibrary.org/newest-evidence-confirms-and-corroborates-the-jfk-acoustics-again/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0uwEOqVOKlXg4Mk6xjj0iA" href="https://aarclibrary.org/newest-evidence-confirms-and-corroborates-the-jfk-acoustics-again/" target="_blank">anomalies</a>, and disputes over the nature of President Kennedy's&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(17)33188-2&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1VZT5Ct5tyn-2OFZgqB44V" href="https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(17)33188-2" target="_blank">gunshot wounds</a>&nbsp;have also been extensively&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0379073822000949&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1kYslzJPCCyH0UUAsF96lS" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0379073822000949" target="_blank">modelled</a>&nbsp;and reviewed.</p> <p><b>*Oswald Fits the Pattern:</b>&nbsp;of politically deranged, relatively young, mostly male, social misfits, (some involved in conspiracies, and some not) who've shot, (and shot at) presidents of the United States from&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://ahec.armywarcollege.edu/exhibits/CivilWarImagery/edwards_Assassination.cfm%23:~:text%3DAs%2520the%2520war%2520drew%2520to,to%2520murder%2520President%2520Abraham%2520Lincoln.&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1JUK4mRh32LT89rsauWcvq" href="https://ahec.armywarcollege.edu/exhibits/CivilWarImagery/edwards_Assassination.cfm#:~:text=As%20the%20war%20drew%20to,to%20murder%20President%20Abraham%20Lincoln." target="_blank">Abraham Lincoln</a>, to William McKinley, (who's&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Leon-Czolgosz&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0yoLwz-5FgnBX_RwZLFu0m" href="https://www.britannica.com/biography/Leon-Czolgosz" target="_blank">assassin</a>&nbsp;was convicted, and executed by the State of New York in under 2 months!) to Teddy&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.theodorerooseveltcenter.org/Learn-About-TR/TR-Encyclopedia/Law-and-Justice/John-Flammang-Schrank.aspx&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2YAKsia_s1lv_IV1nFoHdr" href="https://www.theodorerooseveltcenter.org/Learn-About-TR/TR-Encyclopedia/Law-and-Justice/John-Flammang-Schrank.aspx" target="_blank">Roosevelt</a>, to&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.historynewsnetwork.org/article/lee-harvey-oswalds-motives&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0sqFRsX52CKGN6AFqpL0mK" href="https://www.historynewsnetwork.org/article/lee-harvey-oswalds-motives" target="_blank">JFK</a>, to Jerry&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-07-31/the-manson-follower-who-tried-to-kill-president-and-man-who-stopped-her&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3H7DHhGoxpVv4Ag22KI2S_" href="https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-07-31/the-manson-follower-who-tried-to-kill-president-and-man-who-stopped-her" target="_blank">Ford</a>&nbsp;(<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://allthatsinteresting.com/sara-jane-moore&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597471000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2CI-dbbv3BE0JqMagVMNhp" href="https://allthatsinteresting.com/sara-jane-moore" target="_blank">twice</a>!), to Ronald&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-president-reagans-shooter-john-hinckley-fully-released-after-41-years-2022-06-15/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597472000&amp;usg=AOvVaw17dFPeZyFyrw9fP5Cbfr4z" href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-president-reagans-shooter-john-hinckley-fully-released-after-41-years-2022-06-15/" target="_blank">Reagan</a>, and right on up the the two&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn38px7lyy0o&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597472000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2C_AC8koDSDr1BYVPoA5PG" href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn38px7lyy0o" target="_blank">mental cases</a>&nbsp;who most recently&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.hannapub.com/ouachitacitizen/opinion/editorials/the-wall-street-journal-ryan-routh-s-political-motives/article_792f0be0-7b5e-11ef-be3c-4fdb1acc8eb2.html%23google_vignette&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597472000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2bLfOTprObPSOQI6oBla7R" href="https://www.hannapub.com/ouachitacitizen/opinion/editorials/the-wall-street-journal-ryan-routh-s-political-motives/article_792f0be0-7b5e-11ef-be3c-4fdb1acc8eb2.html#google_vignette" target="_blank">tried to</a>&nbsp;assassinate President Trump!&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p><b>*Jack Ruby Just Doesn't Seem to Fit:&nbsp;</b>The low level, but certainly mobbed up night-club owner who killed Lee Harvey Oswald is the most difficult character&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/jack-ruby.htm&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597472000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3ysKvcvEb3BE3Zvu1FNB8D" href="https://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/jack-ruby.htm" target="_blank">to reconcile</a>&nbsp;with a&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.americanheritage.com/why-did-ruby-kill-oswald&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597472000&amp;usg=AOvVaw31G049QU_qS9t4mkLIPTg9" href="https://www.americanheritage.com/why-did-ruby-kill-oswald" target="_blank">lone gunman theory</a>, which, (along with the Federal government's&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://apnews.com/trump-boasted-hed-open-all-jfk-files-but-now-says-he-cant-2f48d57f9ee045d98eb784d2295288ef&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1732300597472000&amp;usg=AOvVaw02hK410fD3A7dbx3h-I0-F" href="https://apnews.com/trump-boasted-hed-open-all-jfk-files-but-now-says-he-cant-2f48d57f9ee045d98eb784d2295288ef" target="_blank">persistent&nbsp;refusal</a>&nbsp;to declassify all the documents associated with the Kennedy assassination investigation) is one more reason many suspect Oswald was likely involved&nbsp;in a wider conspiracy of some sort.</p> <div class="video-embed-field-provider-youtube video-embed-field-responsive-video"><iframe width="854" height="480" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HfGD8FYFqaM?autoplay=0&amp;start=0&amp;rel=0"></iframe> </div> </div> ThThurs: Revelation Pt. 14 https://kgov.com/bel/20241121 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 22:00:00 -0700 7074 at https://kgov.com <div><main role="main"> <article role="article"> <p><strong>* Revelation</strong>:&nbsp;The Book of Revelation vents God's final warning toward those who will not follow Him. Often clouded in mystery, this book has eluded the understanding of millions, and has been used as a pretext for many false prophets. Bob Enyart presents this conclusion of Scripture in light of the Bible's overview. This clear method of study helps to cut through much of the confusion regarding Revelation.<br /> <strong><strong><a advanced="[object Object]" anchor="[object Object]" email="[object Object]" href="http://store.kgov.com/revelation-vol-i-mp3-cd-or-mp3-download/" linktext="" target="[object Object]" type="url" url="[object Object]"><img alt="What We Believe and Why We Believe It" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="306" src="https://cdn3.bigcommerce.com/s-33mrizoy/products/142/images/388/Rev%252520Vol%252520I-Lg__65944.1412612112.1280.1280.jpg?c=2" width="306" /></a></strong></strong><br /> For over a quarter century Bob Enyart has studied God's Word praying for the wisdom to share the truth of Scripture with a lost and dying world. Now you can benefit from this very exciting Bible study. The two Revelation albums address matters of eternal consequence head on. Before listening to these tapes, Bob strongly urges that you read The&nbsp;<strong><a href="http://store.kgov.com/the-plot/">Plot book or listen to The Plot album</a></strong>&nbsp;that will introduce you to the overview of the Bible.&nbsp;Available on&nbsp;<a href="http://store.kgov.com/revelation-vol-i-mp3-cd-or-mp3-download/">MP3-CD or download</a>.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>BEL SUBSCRIPTIONS</strong>: Please consider one of our monthly subscriptions that will not only help support BEL, but they also promote better understanding of the Bible and may equip you to more effectively reach those around you.<br /> <br /> <a href="https://store.kgov.com/monthly-bible-study-sermon-topical-audio-and-video-downloads/" target="_blank"><strong>Monthly Audio &amp; Video&nbsp;Downloads</strong></a>: Now you can subscribe to monthly sermons, Bible studies or topical videos in download form.&nbsp;</p> <p><a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Sermons</strong></a>: Enjoy all of Bob's sermons from the month on&nbsp;Sermon Video DVD, great also to watch with the family. Or, get these on&nbsp;Sermon Audio CDs&nbsp;which are standard audio Compact Discs that will play on any CD player including the one in your car. Or get them on a single&nbsp;Sermon MP3-CD&nbsp;which will play on an MP3 player, in a DVD player, or in your computer.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Bible Studies</strong></a>: Enjoy the Scriptures with Bob's&nbsp;Monthly Bible Study DVDs, great too for a small group Bible study. Or get these teachings on a single&nbsp;Monthly Bible Study Audio MP3- CD which will play on an MP3 player, in a DVD player, or in your computer.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Topical Videos</strong></a>: Coming to your mailbox, you'll get a&nbsp;Monthly Topical DVD&nbsp;to enjoy one of Bob's great videos specially selected to be entertaining and to teach about life from a biblical worldview.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly BEL TV Classics</strong></a>: Enjoy Bob Enyart's timeless, popular TV show delivered to your home on the&nbsp;Monthly BEL TV Classics DVDs&nbsp;with great audio and video clarity thanks to our state-of-the-art mastering from the studio-quality Sony beta tapes to DVD!<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Donation</strong></a>: For folks who just want to make sure that Bob Enyart Live stays on the air, please consider making a pledge in the form of a&nbsp;Monthly Donation.</p> </article> </main> </div> Evolution's Big Squeeze https://kgov.com/bel/20241120 Wed, 20 Nov 2024 22:00:00 -0700 7073 at https://kgov.com <div><p><strong>* List of Discoveries Squeezing Evolution</strong>: Did you know that dinosaurs <a href="https://kgov.com/434-mammal-species-in-dinosaur-layers#rice">ate rice</a> before rice evolved? That turtle shells existed <a href="https://phys.org/news/2013-05-evolutionary-turtle-shell.html" target="_blank" title="partial shell started to evolve 215 mya; full shell found 260 mya, though soft, many of today's turtles have &quot;soft&quot; shells">forty million years</a> before turtle shells began evolving? That insects evolved tongues for eating from flowers 70 million years before flowers evolved? And that birds appeared before birds evolved? The fossil record is a wonderful thing. And more recently, only a 40,000-year squeeze, <a href="https://www.sciencealert.com/surprise-neanderthal-blood-discovery-hints-at-their-origins-and-downfall/amp?__twitter_impression=true" target="_blank">Neanderthal had blood types A, B, and O</a>, shocking evolutionists but expected to us here at Real Science Radio! Sit back and get ready to enjoy another instant classic, today's RSR "list show" on <em>Evolution's Big Squeeze!</em> Our other popular list shows include:<br /> - scientists <a href="https://rsr.org/scientists-rejecting-evolution-and-the-big-bang">doubting</a> Darwin<br /> - evidence against <a href="https://rsr.org/evidence-against-whale-evolution">whale</a> evolution<br /> - problems with 'the <a href="https://rsr.org/problems-with-the-river-carved-the-canyon">river</a> carved the canyon'<br /> - carbon 14 everywhere it <a href="https://rsr.org/list-of-carbon-14-everywhere-it-shouldnt-be">shouldn't</a> be<br /> - dinosaur still-<a href="https://rsr.org/soft-tissue">soft</a> biological tissue<br /> - solar system formation <a href="https://rsr.org/list-of-solar-system-formation-problems">problems</a><br /> - evidence <a href="https://rsr.org/evidence-against-the-big-bang">against</a> the big bang<br /> - evidence <a href="https://rsr.org/evidence-for-the-global-flood">for</a> the global flood<br /> - genomes that just <a href="https://rsr.org/genomes">don't</a> fit<br /> - and our list of <a href="https://rsr.org/list">not so old</a> things! (See also <a href="https://rsr.org/sq2">rsr.org/sq2</a> and <a href="https://rsr.org/sq3">rsr.org/sq3</a>!)</p> <p><strong><a id="squeeze" name="squeeze"></a>* Evolution's Big Squeeze</strong>: Many discoveries squeeze the Darwinian theory's timeframe and of course without a workable timeframe there is no workable theory. Examples, with their alleged (and <a href="http://rsr.org/list-of-not-so-old-things">falsified</a>) old-earth timeframes, include:<br /> - Complex skeletons existed <a href="https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2015.1860" target="_blank" title="2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B">9 million years before</a> they were <a href="https://phys.org/news/2015-11-complex-skeletons-evolved-earlier-fossils.html" target="_blank" title="2015, Phys.org, Complex skeletons evolved earlier than realized, fossils suggest">thought to have evolved</a>, before even the "Cambrian explosion".<br /><a href="//media2.kgov.com/files/turtle-shells.jpg"><img alt="Turtle shells" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="190" src="//media2.kgov.com/files/turtle-shells.jpg" width="190" class="align-right" /></a>- Butterflies existed <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/10/science/fossils-butterflies-moths.html" target="_blank" title="Per the journal Science Advances, January 2018">10 million years before</a> they were <a href="https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/1/e1701568" target="_blank" title="In the journal Science Advances (but not always)">thought to have evolved</a>.<br /> - Parrots existed "much earlier than had been thought", in fact, <a href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080516123153.htm" target="_blank" title="ScienceDaily: Parrot Fossil 55 Million Years Old Discovered In Scandinavia">25 million years before</a> they were <a href="https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/44652827/544.pdf?1460456412=&amp;response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DParrot_Evolution_and_Paleogeographical_E.pdf&amp;Expires=1591752188&amp;Signature=ZrYg5d42QPVVlapw0pT2ve4nxnWLLg1HcyMX8Z6JRer9whzLg1FnMTKOr0gwORO8hgiHmSfQrh4Y-HNHePIUvytiyj7bx9x0jY7qTbYJDGSKXH72YjCgQubRjvKLcZantt7dFC2mEcMens65tsam6wNmdAlaHokXfFUghSPLVI9FNCSWAKpcy4g9KmHUzeYnyGHX557FJ3B7EQ1oY4R4R-k7ecFDkpkIVHoQAR-ztfKRW0ie8WXJpclsLoln9U3G4tHXTucQgz0jwxKemCLLbEsdZpnpPoOdnvdD3wTbvYs37-zDxM9KhSsGIYH2-vErv4c5Np0Z55uQJuUsTC1Wlg__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA" target="_blank" title="1998 Molecular Biology and Evolution: Parrot Evolution and Paleogeographical Events: Mitochondrial DNA Evidence">thought to have evolved</a>.<br /> - Cephalopod fossils (squids, cuttlefish, etc.) appear <a href="https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geology/article-abstract/39/5/483/130552/belemnite-extinction-and-the-origin-of-modern?redirectedFrom=fulltext" target="_blank">35 million years before</a> they were able to propagate.<br /> - Turtle shells <a href="https://phys.org/news/2013-05-evolutionary-turtle-shell.html" target="_blank" title="partial shell started to evolve 215 mya; full shell found 260 mya, though soft, many of today's turtles have &quot;soft&quot; shells">40 million years</a> <a href="https://phys.org/news/2013-05-evolutionary-turtle-shell.html" target="_blank" title="Smithsonian: Discovery: Turtle shells appeared 40 million years earlier than previously believed">before</a> turtle shells began evolving<br /> - Trees began evolving <a href="https://rsr.org/trees-45-million-years-before-thought-to-evolve">45 million years before</a> they were thought to evolve<br /> - Spores appearing <a href="https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03327.x" target="_blank">50 million years before</a> the plants that made them (not unlike footprints systematically appearing "millions of years before" the creatures that made them, as <a href="https://creation.com/is-genesis-history-doco-review#ross" target="_blank">affirmed</a> by Dr. Marcus Ross, associate professor of geology).<br /> - Sponges existed <a href="https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/03/05/1414577112" target="_blank" title="2015, PNAS, Sponge grade body fossil with cellular resolution dating 60 Myr before the Cambrian">60 million years before</a> they were <a href="https://phys.org/news/2015-07-tiny-sponge-fossil-evolutionary.html" target="_blank" title="2015, Phys.org, Tiny sponge fossil upsets evolutionary model">believed to have evolved</a>.<br /> - Dinosaurs <a href="https://kgov.com/434-mammal-species-in-dinosaur-layers#rice">ate rice</a> before it evolved</p> <figure role="group" class="align-right"><a href="//media2.kgov.com/files/fruit-fly-proboscis.png"><img alt="Fruit fly proboscis as an example of other proboscises" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="147" src="//media2.kgov.com/files/fruit-fly-proboscis.png" width="178" /></a> <figcaption>Example</figcaption></figure> <p>- Insect proboscis (tongue) in moths and butterflies <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/10/science/fossils-butterflies-moths.html" target="_blank" title="NY Times from the journal Science Advances, Jan. 10, 2018 &quot;The finding pushes back the date of this group of insects by about 70 million years, and refutes the idea that the proboscis first evolved alongside flowers.&quot;">70 million years before</a> previously believed has them evolving before flowers.<br /> - Arthropod brains fully developed with central nervous system running to eyes and appendages just like modern arthropods <a href="https://rsr.org/living-fossils#horseshoe-crab">90 million years earlier</a> than previously known (prior to 2021, now, allegedly 310mya)<br /> - 100 million years ago and <a href="https://www.icr.org/article/one-hundred-million-year-old-bird-still-bird" target="_blank">already a bird</a><br /> - Fossil pollen <a href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131001191811.htm" target="_blank">pushes back plant evolution 100 million years</a>.<br /> - Mammalian hair allegedly <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010NW.....97..683V" target="_blank" title="Mammalian hairs in Early Cretaceous amber">100-million-years-old</a> show that, "the morphology of hair cuticula may have remained <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010NW.....97..683V" target="_blank">unchanged</a> throughout most of mammalian evolution", regarding the overlapping cells that lock the hair shaft into its follicle.<br /> - Piranha-like flesh-eating teeth (and bitten prey) found pushing back such fish <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-10/cp-1op101118.php" target="_blank">125 million years earlier</a> than <a href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/14-fun-facts-about-piranhas-180951948/#:~:text=Fossil%20evidence%20puts%20piranha%20ancestors,around%209%20million%20years%20ago." target="_blank" title="Smithsonian Magazine 2014">previously claimed</a>  <br /> - Shocking organic molecules in "<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0224-5">200 million-years-old leaves</a>" from ginkgoes and conifers show <a href="http://www.icr.org/article/fossil-plants-contain-original-molecules" target="_blank">unexpected</a> stasis.<br /> - Plant <a href="https://phys.org/news/2011-04-genetic-darwin-mystery-ancient-evolution.html" target="_blank">genetic sophistication pushed back 200 million years</a>.</p> <a href="//media2.kgov.com/files/evolution-squeeze-land-plants-evolve-early-google-20191227.png"><img alt="Land plants appear hundreds of millions of years before expected" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="//media2.kgov.com/files/evolution-squeeze-land-plants-evolve-early-google-sm.jpg" class="align-center" /></a> <p>- Jellyfish fossils (<em>Medusoid Problematica</em> :) <a href="https://creation.com/fossil-jellyfish-pilbara" target="_blank">200 million years earlier</a> than expected; here <a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0001121" target="_blank">from 500My ago</a>.<br /> - Green seaweed <a href="https://www.sciencealert.com/these-fossils-are-seaweed-that-lived-a-billion-years-ago" target="_blank" title="2020, ScienceAlert &quot;Mind blowing fossils&quot;">200 million years earlier</a> than expected, pushed back now <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-020-1122-9" target="_blank" title="2020: Nature Ecology &amp; Evolution">to a billion years ago</a>! <br /> - The acanthodii fish had color vision <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms6920" target="_blank">300 million years ago</a>, but then, and wait, Cheiracanthus fish allegedly <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/ca718ed4-4303-11e6-9b66-0712b3873ae1" target="_blank" title="According to the Financial Times report from London's Natural History Museum">388 million years ago</a> already had <a href="http://rsr.org/eye#color"><em>color</em> vision</a>.<br /> - Color vision (for which <a href="http://rsr.org/eye#color">there is no </a><a href="http://rsr.org/eye#color">Darwinian</a><a href="http://rsr.org/eye#color"> evolutionary <em>small-step</em></a> to be had, from monochromatic), existed "<a href="https://www.livescience.com/49238-fossil-eye-cells-color-vision.html" target="_blank">300 million years ago</a>" in fish, and these allegedly "120-million-year-old" bird's <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/science/2018/01/17/this-birds-eyeball-survived-120-million-years.html" target="_blank">rod and cone fossils</a> stun researchers :)<br /> - <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12052-008-0087-y" target="_blank">400-million-year-old</a> <em>Murrindalaspis</em> placoderm fish "eye muscle attachment, the eyestalk attachment and openings for the optic nerve, and arteries and veins supplying the eyeball" The paper's author writes, "Of course, we would not expect the preservation of ancient structures made entirely of soft tissues (e.g. rods and cone cells in the retina...)." So, check this next item... :)<br /> - And... no vertebrates in the Cambrian? Well, from the journal Nature in 2014, a "Lower-Middle Cambrian... primitive fish displays <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature13414" target="_blank">unambiguous vertebrate features</a>: a notochord, a pair of prominent camera-type eyes, paired nasal sacs, possible cranium and arcualia, W-shaped myomeres, and a post-anal tail" Primitive?<br /> - Fast-growing <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20657768" target="_blank">juvenile bone tissue</a>, thought to appear in the Cretaceous, has been pushed back 100 million years: "This pushes the origin of fibrolamellar bone in Sauropterygia back from the Cretaceous to the early Middle Triassic..."<br /><a id="trilobite-guts" name="trilobite-guts"></a><a id="trilobites" name="trilobites"></a>- Trilobites "advanced" (<a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0184982" target="_blank">not the predicted primitive</a>) digestion "<a href="https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/laelaps/trilobites-had-guts/" target="_blank">525 million</a>" years ago<br /> - And there's this, a "<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/504776.stm" target="_blank" title="writes the BBC about Haikouichthys ercaicunensis and Myllokunmingia fengjiaoa">530 </a><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/504776.stm" target="_blank">million year old</a>" fish, "50 million years before the current estimate of when fish evolved"<br /> - <i>Mycobacterium <a href="https://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/earliest-evidence-of-tb-may-have-been-found-in-a-245millionyearold-fossil/" target="_blank" title="&quot;Needless to say, this is by far the oldest evidence of either pneumonia or TB unearthed so far.&quot; Yes, needless.">tuberculosis</a></i> <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339235/" target="_blank" title="2015: &quot;Co-evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Homo sapiens&quot;, Search (ctrl-f) for: age of the mrca of all members">100,000 yr-old MRCA</a> (most recent common ancestor) now <a href="https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsos.180225" target="_blank" title="2018 Royal Society: Tuberculosis-like respiratory infection in 245-million-year-old marine reptile suggested by bone pathologies">245 million</a><br /><a id="fungus" name="fungus"></a>- Fungus long claimed to <a href="https://phys.org/news/2019-05-billion-year-fungi-earth-oldest.html" target="_blank" title="Phys.org re 2019 Nature: &quot;fungi... was thought to have appeared on earth around half a billion years ago. But recent fossil specimens unearthed in Canada and analysed using the latest dating technology appear to push back fungi's arrival to the earliest reaches of life on land... to one billion years...&quot;">originate 500M</a> years ago, now found at allegedly <a href="http://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1217-0" target="_blank" title="&quot;the Palaeozoic record indicates that fungi have a strong potential for preservation in the geological record&quot; Ha! See bflist.rsr.org.">950 Mya</a> (and <a href="http://bflist.rsr.org" target="_blank">still</a> <a href="https://m.phys.org/news/2019-05-billion-year-fungi-earth-oldest.html">biological</a> "the distant past... may have been much more 'modern' than we thought." :)<br /> - A rock contained pollen <a href="http://creation.com/pollen-paradox" target="_blank">a billion years before</a> plants evolved, according to a 2007 paper describing "remarkably preserved" fossil spores in the French Alps that had undergone high-grade metamorphism<br /> - <a href="https://agu.confex.com/agu/abscicon19/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/479094">2.5 billion year old cyanobacteria</a> fossils (made of organic material found in a stromatolite) appear about "<a href="https://www.livescience.com/65844-ancient-cyanobacteria-fossils-found.html" target="_blank">200 million years before</a> the [supposed] Great Oxidation Event".<br /> - <a href="https://science.sciencemag.org/content/285/5430/1033">2.7 billion year old eukaryotes</a> (cells with a nucleus) existed (allegedly) <a href="https://science.sciencemag.org/content/285/5430/1033" target="_blank" title="Science, Archean Molecular Fossils and the Early Rise of Eukaryotes, &quot;...persuasive evidence for the existence of eukaryotes 500 million to 1 billion years before the extant fossil record indicates that the lineage arose.&quot;">1 billion years</a> <a href="http://rsr.org/cells-a-billion-years-early-and-fast-rocks">before expected</a><br /> - <a href="https://kgov.com/geology-field-trip-with-dr-walt-brown#prokaryotic" title="Prokaryotic Development, Brun &amp; Shimkets, 2000, p. 114">3.5 billion year "cell division <em>evidently identical</em></a> to that of living filamentous prokaryotes."<br /> - And even older cyanobacteria! At <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/08/the-worlds-oldest-fossils-are-37-billion-years-old/498056/" target="_blank">220 million years earlier</a> than thought, per Nature's <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature19355" target="_blank">3.7 billion year old</a> dating of stromatolites!<br /> - The universe and life itself (in 2019 with the <a href="#billion-years-younger">universe dated a billion, now, no, wait, two billion!, years younger</a> than previously thought, that's not only squeezing biological but also <a href="http://rsr.org/bbp#awe">astronomical</a> <a href="https://kgov.com/plaitt">evolution</a>, with the overall story getting really tight)<br /> - Mantis shrimp, with its rudimentary color but <a href="http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/07/03/natures-most-amazing-eyes-just-got-a-bit-weirder/" target="_blank">advanced UV vision</a>, is allegedly ancient.<br /> - <a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/338/6103/98" target="_blank" title="Science: Complex Dental Structure and Wear Biomechanics in Hadrosaurid Dinosaurs, 2012">Hadrosaur teeth</a>, all 1400 of them, were "more complex than those of cows, horses, and other well-known modern grazers." Professor <a href="http://rsr.org/soft#teeth">stunned</a> by the find! (RSR predicts that, by 2030 just to put an end date on it, more fossils will be found from the geologic column that will be more "advanced" as compared to living organisms, just like this hadrosaur and like the allegedly 100M year old <a href="https://rsr.org/living-fossils#hagfish" target="_blank" title="2019, ICR, Brian Thomas, Ph.D. in paleobiochemistry, &quot;Ancient&quot; Fossil Still Has Hagfish Slime Residue, report from PNAS">hagfish</a>  fossil having more slime glands than living specimens.) <br /> - Trace fossils "exquisitely preserved" of mobile organisms (motility) dated at <a href="https://www.pnas.org/content/116/9/3431" target="_blank" title="2019 PNAS: Organism motility in an oxygenated shallow-marine environment 2.1 billion years ago">2.1 billion years ago</a>, a full 1.5 billion earlier than <a href="https://www.livescience.com/64743-oldest-motility-on-earth.html" target="_blank" title="&quot;About 2.1 billion years ago, a blob-like creature inched along... Until this discovery, the earliest evidence of motility... dated to about 570 million years ago, according to fossils from different locations. That's a good 1.5 billion years younger than the new finding.&quot;">previously believed</a><br /> - Various multicellular organisms allegedly <a href="https://www.pnas.org/content/116/9/3431" target="_blank" title="2019 PNAS">2.1 billion</a> <a href="https://www.nature.com/news/2010/100630/full/news.2010.323.html" target="_blank" title="Nature, 2010, Ancient macrofossils unearthed in West Africa">years old</a>, show multicellularity <a href="https://www.astrobio.net/origin-and-evolution-of-life/multicellular-life-evolve/" target="_top" title="NASA funded Astrobiology mag, 2015 &quot;the first multicellular animals not appearing until about 600 million years ago&quot;">1.5 billion years sooner</a> than long believed  <br /> - <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/27/world/new-giant-dinosaur-brontosaurus-relative/index.html" target="_blank" title="CNN quote from Jonah Choiniere, a Current Biology 2018 paper author and paleontology professor">Pre-sauropod</a> 26,000-pound dinosaur "shows us that even as far back as 200 million years ago, these animals had already become the largest vertebrates to ever walk the Earth."<br /> - The Evo-devo squeeze, i.e., evolutionary developmental biology, as with <a href="http://rsr.org/evo-devo-undermining-darwinism">rsr.org/evo-devo-undermining-darwinism</a>.<br /> - Extinct Siberian one-horned rhinos <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46358789" target="_blank">coexisted with mankind</a>.<br /> - Whale "evolution" is being crushed in the industry-wide "big squeeze". First, geneticist claims whales evolved from hippos but paleontologists say hippos evolved tens of millions of years too late! And what's worse than that is that fossil finds continue to compress the time available for whale evolution. To not violate its own plot, the Darwinist story doesn't start animals evolving back into the sea until the cast includes land animals suitable to undertake the legendary journey. The recent excavation of whale fossils on an island of the Antarctic Peninsula further compresses the <em>already absurdly fast 10 million years</em> to allegedly evolve from the land back to the sea, down to as little as one million years. BioOne in 2016 reported a fossil that is "among the <a href="https://bioone.org/journals/ameghiniana/volume-53/issue-3/AMGH.02.02.2016.2922/Eocene-Basilosaurid-Whales-from-the-La-Meseta-Formation-Marambio-Seymour/10.5710/AMGH.02.02.2016.2922.short" target="_blank">oldest occurrences</a> of basilosaurids worldwide, indicating a rapid radiation and dispersal of this group since at least the early middle Eocene." By this assessment, various techniques produced <a href="http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.5710/AMGH.02.02.2016.2922?journalCode=ameg" target="_blank">various published dates</a>. (See the evidence that falsifies the canonical whale evolution story at <a href="http://rsr.org/whale-evolution-problems">rsr.org/whales</a>.)<!--break--></p> <p><strong>* Ancient Hierarchical Insect Society</strong>: "Thanks to some well-preserved remains, researchers now believe arthropod social structures <em>have been around longer than anyone ever imagined</em>. The encased specimens of ants and termites recently studied date back [allegedly] 100 million years."</p> <p><div class="video-filter video-youtube video-center vf-p1cjvri74u"> <iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/P1cj_vri74U?modestbranding=0&amp;amp;html5=1&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;autoplay=0&amp;amp;wmode=opaque&amp;amp;loop=0&amp;amp;controls=1&amp;amp;autohide=0&amp;amp;showinfo=0&amp;amp;theme=dark&amp;amp;color=red" width="400" height="400" allowfullscreen="true" frameborder="0"></iframe> </div> </p> <p>Also from the video about "the bubonic plague", the "disease is well known as a Middle Ages mass killer... Traces of very similar bacteria were found on [an allegedly] 20-million-year-old flea trapped in amber." And regarding "Caribbean lizards... Even though they are [allegedly] 20 million years old, the reptiles inside the golden stones were <em>not found to differ from their contemporary counterparts in any significant way</em>. Scientists attribute the rarity [Ha! A rarity or the rule? Check out <a href="https://rsr.org/stasis">rsr.org/stasis</a>.] to stable ecological surroundings."</p> <p><strong><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/evolution-theory-out-of-africa-dali-skull-china-homo-erectus-sapiens-latest-a8064306.html"><img alt="Skull found in China AGAIN rewriting history of human evolution..." data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="362" src="//media.kgov.com/files/rewrite-human-history-AGAIN-201711-china.jpg" width="311" class="align-right" /></a><a id="humans" name="humans"></a><a id="rewrite" name="rewrite"></a><a id="africa" name="africa"></a><a id="out-of-africa" name="out-of-africa"></a><a id="mummies" name="mummies"></a><a id="mummy" name="mummy"></a>* Squeezing and Rewriting Human History</strong>: Some squeezing simply makes aspects of the Darwinian story harder to maintain while other squeezing contradicts fundamental claims. So consider the following discoveries, most of which came from about a 12-month period beginning in 2017 which squeeze (and some even falsify) the Out-of-Africa model:<br /> - find two teeth and <em>rewrite human history</em> with allegedly 9.7 million-year-old <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/blog/post/9-7-million-year-old-teeth-fossils-raise-questions-about-human-origin" target="_blank">teeth found in northern Europe</a> (and they're like <a href="http://rsr.org/lucy">Lucy</a>, but "three times older")<br /> - date <a href="https://rsr.org/blue-eyes">blue eyes</a>, when humans first sported them, to as recently as 6,000 years ago  <br /> - get mummy DNA and <em>rewrite human history</em> with a thousand years of <a href="http://rsr.org/out-of-babel-beats-out-of-africa-in-mummy-dna-test">ancient Egyptian mummy DNA</a> contradicting Out-of-Africa and demonstrating Out-of-Babel<br /> - find a few footprints and <em>rewrite human history</em> with allegedly 5.7 million-year-old <a href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/08/170831134221.htm">human footprints in Crete</a><br /> - re-date an old skull and <em>rewrite human history</em> with a <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/skulls-found-morocco-human-origins-discover-archaeology-a8047906.html" target="_blank">very human skull dated at 325,000 years old</a> and redated in the Journal of Physical Anthropology at about 260,000 years old and described in <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/evolution-theory-out-of-africa-dali-skull-china-homo-erectus-sapiens-latest-a8064306.html" target="_blank">the UK's Independent</a>, "A skull found in China [40 years ago] could re-write our entire understanding of human evolution."<br /> - date the oldest language in India, Dravidian, with 80 derivatives spoken by 214 million people, which appeared on the subcontinent only <a href="http://www.shh.mpg.de/870797/dravidian-languages" target="_blank">about 4,500 years ago</a>, which means that there is no evidence for human language for nearly 99% of the time that humans were living in Asia. (Ha! See <a href="http://rsr.org/origin-of-language">rsr.org/origin-of-language</a> for the correct explanation.)<br /> - sequence a baby's genome and <em>rewrite human history</em> with a 6-week old girl buried in Alaska <a href="https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/01/alaska-dna-ancient-beringia-genome/" target="_blank">allegedly 11,500 years ago</a> challenging the established history of the New World. (The family buried this baby girl just beneath their home like the practice in ancient Mesopotamia, <a href="https://kgov.com/exodus#buried-beneath-home" title="rsr.org/exodus: &quot;The departing Semites left behind skeletons of newborns... skeletons of infants, sometimes two or three to a box&quot;">the Hebrews</a> who sojourned in Egypt, and <a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2016/09/amazing-intact-statue-of-a-woman-unearthed-at-the-neolithic-city-of-catalhoyuk-in-turkey/" target="_blank">in</a> <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289525849_Living_above_the_Dead_Intramural_Burial_practices_at_Catalhoyuk/figures?lo=1" target="_blank" title="ResearchGate: Living above the Dead: Intramural Burial practices at Çatalhöyük">Çatalhöyük</a> in southern Turkey, one of the world's most ancient settlements.)<br /> - or was that <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature22065" target="_blank">130,000?</a> years ago as <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature22065" target="_blank">the journal Nature</a> <em>rewrites human history</em> with a wild date for New World site<br /> - and find a jawbone and <em>rewrite human history</em> with a modern looking yet allegedly 180,000-year-old <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/science/jawbone-fossil-israel.html" target="_blank">jawbone</a> from Israel which "may rewrite the early migration story of our species" by about 100,000 years, per <a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.aap8369" target="_blank">the journal Science</a><br /> - re-date a primate and lose yet another "missing link" between "Lucy" and humans, as <em>Homo naledi</em> <a href="https://elifesciences.org/articles/24231" target="_blank">sheds a couple million years</a> off its age and drops from supposedly two million years old to (still allegedly) <a href="https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/05/homo-naledi-human-evolution-science/">about 250,000</a> years old, far too "young" to be the allegedly missing link<br /> - re-analysis of the "<a href="https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/famous-ancestor-may-be-ousted-human-family" target="_blank">best candidate</a>" for the most recent ancestor to human beings, <em>Australopithecus sediba</em>, turns out to be a juvenile Lucy-like ape, as Science magazine reports work presented at the American Association of Physical Anthropologists 2017 annual meeting<br /> - find skulls in Morocco and "<em>rewrite human history</em>" <a href="https://www.nature.com/news/oldest-homo-sapiens-fossil-claim-rewrites-our-species-history-1.22114">admits the journal Nature</a>, falsifying also the "East Africa" part of the canonical story<br /> - and from the <em><span class="u-txt-highlight">You Can't Make This Stuff Up</span></em> file, NPR reports in April 2019, <a href="https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/04/10/710278943/ancient-bones-and-teeth-found-in-a-philippines-cave-may-rewrite-human-history" target="_blank">Ancient Bones And Teeth Found In A Philippine Cave May Rewrite Human History</a>. :)<br /> - Meanwhile, whereas every new discovery requires the materialists to rewrite human history, no one has had to rewrite Genesis, not even once. Yet, "We're not claiming that the Bible is a science textbook. <a href="https://kgov.com/the-scopes-monkey-trial-movie-alleged">Not at all</a>. For the textbooks have to be rewritten all the time!" <br /> - And even <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/11/these-may-be-world-s-first-images-dogs-and-they-re-wearing-leashes" target="_blank">this</a> from <em>Science</em>: "humans mastered the art of training and controlling dogs thousands of years <a href="http://rsr.org/genius#dogs" title="Click on the other link for the Science article. This link goes to our Genius of Ancient Man show page">earlier</a> than previously thought."<br /><a id="crete" name="crete"></a><a id="philistines" name="philistines"></a><a id="caphtor" name="caphtor"></a>- RSR's Enyart commented on the <a href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/when-ancient-dna-gets-politicized-180972639/" target="_blank">Smithsonian's 2019 article</a> on ancient DNA possibly deconstructing old myths... </p> <p><a href="//media2.kgov.com/files/smithsonian-ancient-dna-myths-BE-cmt-20190712.png"><img alt="7/12/19 Smithsonian: When Ancient DNA Gets Politicized" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="271" src="//media2.kgov.com/files/smithsonian-ancient-dna-myths-BE-cmt-20190712.png" width="553" /></a></p> <p>This Smithsonian article about an ancient DNA paper in Science Advances, or actually, about the misuse of such papers, was itself a misuse. The published research, <a href="https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/7/eaax0061">Ancient DNA sheds light on the genetic origins of early Iron Age Philistines</a>, confirmed Amos 9:7 by documenting the European origin of the biblical Philistines who came from the island of Caphtor/Crete. The mainstream media completely <a href="https://patternsofevidence.com/2019/07/20/philistine-dna-study-supports-bible/?utm_source=Email&amp;utm_medium=Thinker160DNA&amp;utm_term=&amp;utm_content=&amp;utm_campaign=Thinker160DNA&amp;inf_contact_key=73cc86ba0adf0f14076715590fa08536680f8914173f9191b1c0223e68310bb1" target="_blank">obscured this astounding aspect</a> of the study but the Smithsonian actually stood the paper on its head. [See also <a href="https://rsr.org/archaeology">rsr.org/archaeology.</a>]<br /><br /><strong>* Also Squeezing Darwin's Theory</strong>:<br /> - Evolution happens so slowly that we can't see it, yet<br /> - it happens so fast that millions of <a href="https://kgov.com/christopher-rupe" title="Population Genetics Expert Explains the Darwin-Slaying Science">mutations get</a> <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixation_(population_genetics)" target="_blank">fixed</a> in a blink of geologic time<br /> AND:<br /> - Observing a million species annually should show us a million years of evolution, but it doesn't, yet<br /> - evolution happens so fast that the billions of "intermediary" fossils are missing<br /> AND:<br /> - Waiting for helpful random mutations to show up explains the slowness of evolution, yet<br /> - adaption to changing environments is often immediate, as with Darwin's finches</p> <blockquote> <p><strong><img alt="Photo of a finch bird" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="98" src="//media2.kgov.com/files/finch.jpg" width="146" class="align-right" />Finches Adapt in 17 Years, Not 2.3 Million</strong>: Charles Darwin's finches are claimed to have taken <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11230531" target="_blank">2,300,000 years</a> to diversify from an initial species blown onto the Galapagos Islands. Yet individuals from a single finch species on a U.S. Bird Reservation in the Pacific were introduced to a group of small islands 300 miles away and in <a href="https://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/fulltext/0169-5347(88)90103-6" target="_blank">at most</a> <a href="https://www.academia.edu/20912994/Rapid_morphological_change_in_an_introduced_bird" target="_blank">17</a> <a href="https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/38/4/254/250121">years</a>, like Darwin's finches, they had diversified their beaks, related muscles, and behavior to fill various ecological niches. So Darwin's finches could diversify in just 17 years, and after 2.3 million more years, what had they evolved into? Finches! Hear this also at <a href="https://kgov.com/spetner">rsr.org/lee-spetner</a> and see Jean Lightner's review of the Grants' <em><a href="https://creation.com/unmasking-natural-selection" target="_blank" title="CMI: Unmasking natural selection bookcover A review of 40 Years of Evolution: Darwin’s finches on Daphne Major Island by Peter and Rosemary Grant">40 Years</a></em>.</p> </blockquote> <p>AND:<br /> - Fossils of modern organisms are found "earlier" and "earlier" in the geologic column, and<br /> - the "oldest" organisms are increasingly found to have <a href="https://news.ncsu.edu/2018/12/ichthyosaur-blubber/" target="_blank" title="2018 example: Nature published on Soft Tissue showing Jurassic Ichthyosaur was Warm-Blooded, had Blubber and Camouflage">anatomical</a>, <a href="#ancient-proteins" title="allegedly 145 million-year old still biological protein">proteinaceous</a>, <a href="https://kgov.com/bel/20171110#prokaryotic">prokaryotic</a>, and <a href="#fungus" title="See above...">eukaryotic</a> sophistication and similarity to "modern" organisms<br /> AND:<br /> - Small populations are in danger of extinction (yet they're needed to fix mutations), whereas<br /> - large populations make it impossible for a mutation to become standard<br /> AND:<br /> - Mutations that express changes too late in an organism's development can't effect its fundamental body plan, and<br /> - mutations expressed too early in an organism's development <a href="https://kgov.com/doubt#gelernter">are fatal</a> (hence among the <a href="https://kgov.com/sayings#evolution">Enyart sayings</a>, "Like evolving a vital organ, most major hurdles for evolutionary theory are extinction-level events.")<br /> AND:<br /> - To evolve flight, <a href="https://kgov.com/bad-legs-before-good-wings#legs" title="Evolution teaches that wings evolved from LEGS in dinos, insects, and bats">you'd get bad legs</a><br /> - long before you'd get good wings<br /> AND:<br /> - Most major evolutionary hurdles appear to be extinction-level events<br /><a id="vital" name="vital"></a><a id="vital-organs" name="vital-organs"></a><a id="vlist" name="vlist"></a>- yet somehow even *vital* organs evolve (for many species, that includes reproductive organs, skin, brain, heart, circulatory system, kidney, liver, pancreas, stomach, small intestines, large intestines, lungs -- which are only a part of the complex <a href="https://rsr.org/lists#vital-organs">respiration system</a>)<br /> AND:<br /> - Natural selection of randomly taller, swifter, etc., fish, mammals, etc. explains evolution yet<br /> - development of microscopic molecular machines, feedback mechanisms, etc., which power biology would be oblivous to what's happening in Darwin's macro environment of the entire organism<br /> AND:<br /> - Neo-Darwinism suggests genetic mutation as the engine of evolution yet<br /> - the there is not even a hypothesis for modifying the vast non-genetic information in every living cell including the sugar code, electrical code, the spatial (geometric) code, and the epigenetic code<br /> AND:<br /> - Constant appeals to "convergent" evolution (repeatedly arising vision, echolocation, warm-bloodedness, etc.)<br /> - undermine most Darwinian anatomical classification especially those based on trivialities like odd or even-toed ungulates, etc.<br /> AND:<br /> - Claims that given a single species arising by <a href="https://kgov.com/abiogenesis" title="NASA senior astrobiologist answers RSR question on video...">abiogenesis</a>, then<br /> - Darwinism can explain the diversification of life, ignores the science of ecology and the (often redundant) biological services that species rely upon</p> <p><div class="video-filter video-youtube video-center vf-mrsflnhx8s4"> <iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/MrSFLNHX8S4?modestbranding=0&amp;amp;html5=1&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;autoplay=0&amp;amp;wmode=opaque&amp;amp;loop=0&amp;amp;controls=1&amp;amp;autohide=0&amp;amp;showinfo=0&amp;amp;theme=dark&amp;amp;color=red" width="400" height="400" allowfullscreen="true" frameborder="0"></iframe> </div> </p> <p>AND:</p> <p>- humans' vastly superior intelligence indicates, as bragged about for decades by Darwinists, that ape hominids should have the greatest animal intelligence, except that</p> <p>- many so-called "primitive" creatures and those far distant on Darwin's tee of life, exhibit extraordinary <a href="https://kgov.com/animal-intelligence">rsr.org/animal-intelligence</a> even to processing stimuli that some groups of apes cannot</p> <p>AND:<br /> - Claims that the tree of life emerges from a single (or a few) common ancestors<br /> - conflict with the discoveries of multiple genetic codes and of thousands of <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168952515000347" target="_blank" title="For many years, it had been considered extremely unlikely, if not impossible, that genes with no detectable homology could emerge. With the availability of the full genomic sequence of yeast [for example] this picture changed. About one third of the entire set of genes in baker's yeast has no sequence similarity to genes from other organisms...">orphan</a> <a href="http://www.orfangenes.org/" target="_blank">genes</a> that have no similarity (homology) to any other known genes<br /> AND (as in the New Scientist cover story, "<a href="https://kgov.com/darwin-was-wrong-about-the-tree-of-life" target="_self">Darwin Was Wrong</a> about the tree of life", etc.):<br /> - DNA sequences have contradicted anatomy-based ancestry claims<br /> - Fossil-based ancestry claims have been contradicted by RNA claims<br /> - DNA-based ancestry claims have been contradicted by anatomy claims<br /> - Protein-based ancestry claims have been contradicted by fossil claims.<br /> - And the reverse problem compared to a squeeze. Like finding the largest mall in America built to house just a kid's lemonade stand, see <a href="http://rsr.org/200">rsr.org/200</a> for the astounding lack of genetic diversity in humans, plants, and animals, so much so that it could all be accounted for in just about 200 generations!<br /> - The <a href="https://kgov.com/bel/20160520" target="_self">multiplied things that evolved multiple times</a><br /> - Etc.</p> <p><strong><a id="list-of-ways" name="list-of-ways"></a><a id="bias" name="bias"></a>* List of Ways Darwinists Invent their Tree of Life, aka Pop Goes the Weasle –</strong><strong> Head and Shoulders, Knees and Toes</strong>:</p> <blockquote> <p><img alt="Quotation mark" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="43" src="//media2.kgov.com/files/quotation-marks.jpg" width="61" class="align-left" />Evolutionists change their selection of what evidence they use to show 'lineage', from DNA to fossils to genes to body plans to teeth to many specific anatomical features to proteins to behavior to developmental similarities to habitat to RNA, etc. and to a combination of such. Darwinism is an entire endeavor based on selection bias, a kind of logical fallacy. By anti-science they arbitrarily select evidence that best matches whichever evolutionary story is currently preferred." -Bob E.</p> </blockquote> <p>The methodology used to create the family tree edifice to show evolutionary relationships classifies the descent of organisms based on such attributes as <a href="http://tolweb.org/Perissodactyla/15980" target="_blank">odd</a>-<a href="https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/vertpaleo/fhc/relatives1.htm" target="_blank">toed</a> and even-toed ungulates. Really? If something as <a href="http://rsr.org/eye">wildly sophisticated as vision</a> allegedly <a href="https://kgov.com/things-that-evolved-multiple-times">evolved multiple times</a> (a dozen or more), then for cryin' out loud, why couldn't something as relatively simple as odd or even toes repeatedly evolve? How about dinosaur's evolving eggs with hard shells? Turns out that "<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2412-8" target="_blank" title="June 2020, Nature, The first dinosaur egg was soft">hard-shelled eggs evolved at least three times</a> independently in dinosaurs" (Nature, 2020). However, whether a genus has an odd or even number of toes, and similar distinctions, form the basis for the 150-year-old Darwinist methodology. Yet its leading proponents still haven't acknowledged that their tree building is arbitrary and invalid. Darwin's tree <a href="https://kgov.com/darwin-was-wrong-about-the-tree-of-life">recently fell</a> anyway, and regardless, it has been known to be even theoretically invalid all these many decades. Consider also bipedalism? In their false paradigm, couldn't that evolve twice? How about <a href="https://kgov.com/chiropractor-on-spinal-column-evolution">vertebrate</a> and non-vertebrates, for that matter, evolving multiple times? Etc., etc., etc. Darwinists determine evolutionary family-tree taxonomic relationships based on numbers of toes, when desired, or <a href="https://www.livescience.com/3945-history-dinosaurs.html" target="_blank">on hips</a> (distinguishing, for example, dinosaur orders, <a href="https://www.livescience.com/3945-history-dinosaurs.html" target="_blank">until they didn't</a>) or <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/27/world/new-giant-dinosaur-brontosaurus-relative/index.html" target="_blank" title="CNN quote from Jonah Choiniere, a Current Biology 2018 paper author and paleontology professor">limb bones</a>, or feathers, or genes, or fossil sequence, or neck bone, or..., or..., or... Etc.</p> <p><a id="platypus" name="platypus"></a>So the platypus, for example, can be described as evolving from pretty much whatever story would be in vogue at the moment...  </p> <a href="https://www.icr.org/article/glow-in-the-dark-platypuses-illuminate-the-creator"><img alt="The playpus evolved from a beaver, or maybe a rooster, or maybe a reptile, or a turtle, or an otter, or a snake, or a bear, or a duck? " data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="//media2.kgov.com/files/platypus-evolved-from-well-everything.jpg" class="align-center" /></a> <p><strong><a id="ancient-proteins" name="ancient-proteins"></a>* "Ancient" Protein as Advanced as Modern Protein</strong>: A book review in the journal <em>Science</em> <a href="https://bflist.rsr.org" target="_blank" title="See one of the 1972 items at bflist.rsr.org ">states</a>, "the major conclusion is reached that 'analyses made of the oldest fossils thus far studied do not suggest that their [allegedly 145-million year-old] proteins were chemically any simpler than those now being produced.'" 1972, Biochemistry of Animal Fossils, p. 125</p> <p><strong>* "Ancient" Lampreys Just Modern Lampreys with Decomposed Brain and Mouth Parts</strong>: Ha! Researches spent half-a-year documenting how fish decay. RSR is so glad they did! One of the lessons learned? "[C]ertain parts of the brain and the mouth <a href="https://answersingenesis.org/fossils/how-are-fossils-formed/rotting-fish-and-creationists/" target="_blank" title="Thanks AiG for keeping creationists up to date!">that distinguish the animals from earlier relatives</a> begin a rapid decay within 24 hours..." :)</p> <p><strong>* 140-million Year Old Spider Web</strong>: The BBC and National Geographic report on a 140-million year old spider web in amber which, as young-earth creationists expect, shows threads that resemble silk spun by modern spiders. Evolutionary scientists on the otherhand express <a href="https://kgov.com/../bel/20090918" target="_blank">surprise</a> "that spider webs have stayed the same for 140 million years." And see <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CAwQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.bbc.co.uk%2F2%2Fhi%2Fuk_news%2Fengland%2Fsussex%2F7925629.stm&amp;ei=I6nPSurQPITl8AaHyIz2Aw&amp;usg=AFQjCNFBt6lWKZCREw4vJ9JjeK92yXklOA&amp;sig2=_vYKBc95s-qCoA3DujD-JA" target="_blank">the BBC</a>.</p> <p><strong>* Highly-Credentialed Though Non-Paleontologist on Flowers</strong>: Dr. Harry Levin who spent the last 15 years of a <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190821024116/http://www.flwildflowers.com/essays/">brilliant career</a> researching paleontology presents much evidence that flowering plants had to originate not 150 million years ago but <a href="http://www.flwildflowers.com/origin/" target="_blank">more than 300 million years ago</a>. (To convert that to an actual historical timeframe, the evidence indicates flowers must have existed prior to the time that the strata, which is popularly dated to 300 mya, actually formed.)</p> <p><strong>* Rampant Convergence</strong>: Ubiquitous appeals to "convergent" evolution (vision, echolocation, <a href="https://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/warmbloodedness-may-have-evolved-independently-twice-in-mammals-ancestors/" target="_blank">warm-bloodedness</a>, <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0775-x.epdf" target="_blank">icthyosaur/dolphin anatomy</a>, etc.), all allegedly <a href="https://kgov.com/things-that-evolved-multiple-times">evolving multiple times</a>, undermines anatomical classification based on trivialities like odd or even-toed ungulates, etc.</p> <p><strong><a id="astronomy" name="astronomy"></a><a id="billion-years-younger" name="billion-years-younger"></a><a id="universe" name="universe"></a>* Astronomy's Big Evolution Squeeze</strong>:<br /> - <a href="https://kgov.com/bbp#precision-cosmology">Universe a billion, wait, two billion, years younger than thought</a><br />   (so now it has to evolve <a href="https://kgov.com/bb#summary">even more impossibly rapidly</a>)<br /> - <a href="#suns-evolution-squeezes-lifes-evolution" title="See this just below...">Sun's evolution squeezes biological evolution</a><br /> - <a href="https://kgov.com/evidence-contrary-to-the-big-bang" title="See the first bullet (of a zillion) in our RSR List of Evidence Against the Big Bang">Galaxies evolving too quickly</a><br /> - <a href="http://rsr.org/bb#dust">Dust evolving too quickly</a><br /> - <a href="http://rsr.org/bb#black-hole">Black holes evolving too quickly</a><br /> - <a href="http://www.space.com/11086-ancient-galaxy-cluster-young.html" target="_blank" title="Beware the Space.com headline, which gets the story exactly backwards... ">Clusters of galaxies evolving too quickly</a>.</p> <p><strong><a id="suns-evolution-squeezes-lifes-evolution" name="suns-evolution-squeezes-lifes-evolution"></a><a id="cool" name="cool"></a>* The Sun's Evolution Squeezes Life's Evolution</strong>: The earlier evolutionists claim that life began on Earth, the more trouble they have with astrophysicists. Why? They claim that a few billion years ago the Sun would have been far more unstable and cooler. The journal Nature reports that the <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09961">Faint young Sun paradox remains</a> for the "Sun was fainter when the Earth was young, but the climate was generally at least as warm as today". Further, our star would shoot out radioactive waves many of which being violent enough to blow out Earth's atmosphere into space, leaving Earth dead and dry like Mars without an atmosphere. And ignoring the fact that powerful computer simulators cannot validate the nebula theory of star formation, if the Sun had formed from a condensing gas cloud, a billion years later it still would have been emitting far less energy, even 30% less, than it does today. Forget about the claimed one-degree increase in the planet's temperature from man-made <a href="https://kgov.com/global-warming" title="See RSR rebut manmade global warming...">global warming</a>, back when Darwinists imagine life arose, by this just-so story of life spontaneously generating in a warm pond somewhere (which itself <a href="https://kgov.com/water-is-the-enemy-of-abiogenesis">is impossible</a>), <em>the Earth would have been an ice ball</em>, with an average temperature of four degrees Fahrenheit below freezing! See also CMI's video download <a href="https://usstore.creation.com/the-young-sun" target="_blank" title="See CMI's video download!">The Young Sun</a>.</p> <p><strong><a id="zircons" name="zircons"></a>* Zircons Freeze in Molten Eon Squeezing Earth's Evolution?</strong> Zircons "dated" 4 to 4.4 billion years old would have had to freeze (form) when the Earth allegedly was in its Hadean (<em>Hades</em>) Eon and still molten. Geophysicist Frank Stacey (Cambridge fellow, etc.) has suggested they may have formed <span>above ocean trenches where it would be coolest. One problem is that <a href="https://rsr.org/plate-tectonics">even further</a> squeezes the theory of plate tectonics requiring it to operate two billion years before otherwise claimed. A second problem (for these zircons and the plate tectonics theory itself) is that ancient trenches (now filled with sediments; others raised up above sea level; etc.) have never been found. A third problem is that these zircons contain </span>low isotope ratios of carbon-13 to carbon-12 which evolutionists may try to explain as evidence for life existing even a half-billion years before they otherwise claim. For more about this (and to understand how these zircons actually did form) <a href="https://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/Radioactivity4.html" target="_blank">just click</a> and then search (ctrl-f) for: <em>zircon character</em>.</p> <p><strong>* Evolution Squeezes Life to Evolve with Super Radioactivity</strong>: Radioactivity today breaks chromosomes and produces neutral, harmful, and fatal birth defects. Dr. Walt Brown <a href="https://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/Radioactivity2.html" target="_blank" title="Search (ctrl-f) for: Potassium-40">reports</a> that, "A 160-pound person experiences 2,500 carbon-14 disintegrations each second", with about 10 disintergrations per second in our DNA. Worse for evolutionists is that, "Potassium-40 is the most abundant radioactive substance in... every living thing." Yet the percentage of Potassium that was radioactive in the past would have been far in excess of its percent today. (All this is somewhat akin to screws in complex machines changing into nails.) So life would have had to arise from inanimate matter (an <a href="https://rsr.org/abiogenesis">impossibility</a> of course) when it would have been far more radioactive than today.</p> <p><strong>* Evolution of Uranium Squeezed by Contrasting Constraints</strong>: Uranium's two most abundant isotopes have a highly predictable ratio with 235U/238U equaling 0.007257 with a standard deviation of only <a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ac050912p" target="_blank" title="ACS, Analytical Chemistry, 2005, Table 1, Std deviation 0.0017(σa)">0.000017</a>. Big bang advocates claim that these isotopes formed in distant stellar cataclysms. Yet that these isotopes <em>somehow collected in innumerable small ore bodies in a fixed ratio is absurd</em>. The impossibility of the "big bang" explanation of the uniformity of the uranium ratio (<a href="https://rsr.org/bb#ratio">rsr.org/bb#ratio</a>) simultaneously contrasts in the most shocking way with its opposite impossibility of the <em>missing</em> uniform distribution of radioactivity (see <a href="https://rsr.org/bb#distribution">rsr.org/bb#distribution</a>) with 90% of Earth's radioactivity in the Earth's crust, actually, the continental crust, and even at that, preferentially near granite! A stellar-cataclysmic explanation within the big bang paradigm for the origin of uranium is severely squeezed into being falsified by these contrasting constraints.</p> <p><strong>* Remarkable Sponges? Yes, But For What Reason?</strong> Study co-author Dr. Kenneth S. Kosik, the Harriman Professor of Neuroscience at UC Santa Barbara said, "Remarkably, the sponge genome now reveals that, along the way toward the emergence of animals, genes for an entire network of many specialized cells evolved and laid the basis for the core gene logic of organisms that no longer functioned as single cells." And then there's this: these simplest of creatures have manufacturing capabilities that far exceed our own, as Degnan says, "Sponges produce an amazing array of chemicals of direct interest to the pharmaceutical industry. They also biofabricate silica fibers directly from seawater in an environmentally benign manner, which is of great interest in communications [i.e., fiber optics]. With the genome in hand, we can decipher the methods used by these simple animals to produce materials that <em>far exceed our current engineering and chemistry capabilities</em>."</p> <p><strong>Kangaroo Flashback</strong>: From our <a href="https://kgov.com/evo-devo" target="_blank">RSR Darwin's Other Shoe</a> program: The director of Australia's <a href="http://kangaroo.genomics.org.au/public/" target="_blank">Kangaroo Genomics Centre</a>, Jenny Graves, that "There [are] great chunks of the human genome… sitting right there in the kangaroo genome." And the 20,000 genes in the kangaroo (roughly the same number as in humans) are "largely the same" as in people, and Graves adds, "a lot of them are in the same order!" <a href="http://creation.com/" target="_blank">CMI's</a> Creation editors add that "unlike chimps, kangaroos are not supposed to be our 'close relatives.'" And "Organisms as diverse as leeches and lawyers are 'built' using the same developmental genes." So Darwinists were wrong to use that kind of genetic similarity as evidence of a developmental pathway from apes to humans.</p> <p><strong>Hibernating Turtles</strong>: Question to the evolutionist: What happened to <a href="https://creation.com/focus-creation-283" target="_blank">the first turtles</a> that <a href="https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0250" target="_blank">fell asleep hibernating</a> underwater?</p> <p><strong>SHOW UPDATE </strong><strong>Of Mice and Men</strong>: Whereas evolutionists used a very superficial claim of chimpanzee and human genetic similarity as evidence of a close relationship, mice and men are pretty close also. From the Human Genome Project, <em><a href="http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/faq/compgen.shtml#stubbs" target="_blank" title="How closely related are mice and humans? How many genes are the same?">How closely related are mice and humans?</a></em>, "Mice and humans (indeed, most or all mammals including dogs, cats, rabbits, monkeys, and apes) have roughly the same number of nucleotides in their genomes -- about 3 billion base pairs. This comparable DNA content implies that all mammals [RSR: like roundworms :)] contain more or less the same number of genes, and indeed our work and the work of many others have provided evidence to confirm that notion. I know of only a few cases in which no mouse counterpart can be found for a particular human gene, and for the most part we see essentially a one-to-one correspondence between genes in the two species."</p> <p><strong>* Related RSR Reports</strong>: See our reports on the fascinating DNA sequencing results from <a href="https://kgov.com/bel/20090501">roundworms</a> and the <a href="https://kgov.com/bel/20090519">chimpanzee's Y chromosome</a>!</p> <p><strong><a id="bottleneck" name="bottleneck"></a>* Genetic Bottleneck, etc</strong>: Here's an excerpt from <a href="http://rsr.org/why-was-canaan-cursed">rsr.org/why-was-canaan-cursed</a>...</p> <p>A prediction about the worldwide distribution of human genetic sequencing (see <a href="https://kgov.com/why-was-canaan-cursed#specific-prediction">below</a>) is an outgrowth of the Bible study at that same link (aka <a href="https://rsr.org/canaan">rsr.org/canaan</a>), in that scientists will discover a genetic pattern resulting from not three but four sons of Noah's wife. Relevant information comes also from mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) which is not part of any of our 46 chromosomes but resides outside of the nucleus. Consider first some genetic information about Jews and Arabs, Jewish priests, Eve, and Noah.</p> <p><strong>Jews and Arabs Biblical Ancestry</strong>: Dr. Jonathan Sarfati <a href="https://creation.com/genesis-correctly-predicts-y-chromosome-pattern" target="_blank" title="&quot;Genesis correctly predicts Y-Chromosome pattern: Jews and Arabs shown to be descendants of one man!&quot;">quotes</a> the director of the Human Genetics Program at New York University School of Medicine, Dr. Harry Ostrer, who in 2000 <a href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/05/000509003653.htm" target="_blank" title="&quot;Jews Are The Genetic Brothers Of Palestinians, Syrians, And Lebanese&quot;">said</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Jews and Arabs are all really children of Abraham … And all have preserved their Middle Eastern genetic roots over 4,000 years.</p> </blockquote> <p>This familiar pattern, of the latest science corroborating biblical history, continues in Dr. Sarfati's article, <a href="http://creation.com/genesis-correctly-predicts-y-chromosome-pattern" target="_blank" title="See Dr. Sarfati's article, especially section: How do Y chromosomes fit into the biblical framework?">Genesis correctly predicts Y-Chromosome pattern: Jews and Arabs shown to be descendants of one man</a>.</p> <p><strong>Jewish Priests Share Genetic Marker</strong>: The journal <em>Nature</em> in its scientific correspondence <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v385/n6611/abs/385032a0.html" target="_blank" title="Article available for purchase at Nature.com">published</a>, <a href="http://www.familytreedna.com/pdf/nature97385.html" target="_blank" title="Text published by the world's largest repository of family DNA ancestry...">Y Chromosomes of Jewish Priests</a>, by scientists from the University of Arizona, Haifa (Israel's) Technical Institute, and University College of London, who wrote:</p> <blockquote> <p>These Y-chromosome haplotype differences confirm a distinct paternal genealogy for Jewish priests.</p> </blockquote> <p>The central historical claim of the cultic Book of Mormon is that American Indians are Jews. As expected, genetic science does not reinforce, but rather <a href="http://godandscience.org/cults/dna.html" target="_blank" title="Great article about DNA and this LDS false teaching at an old-earth creation site...">contradicts, that claim</a>, which is also seen to be false culturally, religiously, and historically. Contrariwise, because the Judeo-Christian Scriptures are true, mountains of evidence corroborate their historic claims. Regarding Jewish priests, Dr. Sarfati <a href="http://creation.com/genesis-correctly-predicts-y-chromosome-pattern" target="_blank" title="See Dr. Sarfati's article, especially section: How do Y chromosomes fit into the biblical framework?">adds</a> to the above that, "These Jews have the name <em>Cohen</em>, the Hebrew for priest, or variants like Cohn, Kohn, Cowen, Kogan, Kagan, etc." and that, "Even today, it is possible to identify the Levites, because they have names such as Levy, Levine, Levinson, Levental..."</p> <p><strong><a id="eve" name="eve"></a><a id="Eve" name="Eve"></a><a id="mtEve" name="mtEve"></a>Mitochondrial Eve</strong>: As reported by <a href="http://www.anngibbons.com/bio/bio.shtml" target="_blank" title="See Gibbons bio. From UCLA and MIT, Ann is a long-time science journalist specializing in evolution at the peer-reviewed Science magazine.">Ann Gibbons</a> in <em>Science</em> magazine's article, <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/short/279/5347/28">Calibrating the Mitochondrial Clock</a>, using actual measured mutation rates, if these rates have been constant, then "mitochondrial Eve… would be a mere 6000 years old." The first evolutionary estimates were that mtEve (a single female or a single female's lineage) lived 200,000 years ago, but then in 1997 the journal <em>Nature Genetics</em> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9090380" target="_blank">published</a>, "A high observed substitution rate in the human mitochondrial DNA..." reinforced by a paper in the <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology</em> on "<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.22052/abstract" target="_blank">High mitochondrial mutation rates</a>..." Actually measured rapid mutation rates (now estimated at one <a href="http://creation.com/mteve-biblical-eve" target="_blank" title="Creationist Robert Carter (published on mtEve in an Oxford journal) has email dispute with an evolutionist geneticist...">every other generation</a>), is what led to the recalibration of Eve's age down to thousands, not hundreds of thousands of years. From an anthropology professor's popular <a href="http://weber.ucsd.edu/~dkjordan/resources/clarifications/MitochondrialEve.html" target="_blank" title="Prof. Emeritus D. K. Jordan, Univ. of Calif. San Diego">article</a>, "Analyses of the mitochondrial DNA of living humans from around the globe have shown that all are ultimately descended (if we trace exclusively through female links) from a common ancestress..." This evolutionary observation would also result of course if in fact we have all descended from an original, created biblical Eve. However, scientists quickly point out that their analysis doesn't require a biblical Eve. For example, you and all your full siblings have your maternal grandmother's mtDNA and yet you are all also descended from another woman from her generation, your paternal grandmother. Yet this mtEve finding does falsify two evolutionary expectations, the first from an old minority view held by evolutionists like the discoverer of "<a href="http://creation.com/is-there-really-evidence-that-man-descended-from-the-apes" target="_blank" title="Brief topic overview; then search creation.com for &quot;peking man&quot;">Peking Man</a>," that humans evolved from parallel hominid groups. Secondly, just as the discovery of <a href="https://kgov.com/dinosaur-soft-tissue">soft-tissue from a <em>T. rex</em></a> falsified the evolutionary expectation that we would never find original biological material from dinosaur fossils, the recent age of mitochondrial Eve falsifies the mainstream Darwinist expectation that she would have been much older. That expectation is falsified whether we use the 6,000 year date which is based on exclusively human DNA and documented mutation rates, or even when evolutionists <a href="https://kgov.com/list#Eve" target="_blank" title="See how evolutionists use chimp evolution as a fudge factor... ">stretch that date</a> by one or two orders of magnitude as they do by including chimp DNA in their data set (which is circular reasoning if used as evidence for an evolutionary time frame). Either way, this finding falsifies the evolutionary expectation that such an Eve would have lived much earlier. (For more about the recent Eve, see creation.com's "<a href="http://creation.com/a-shrinking-date-for-eve" target="_blank">A shrinking date for Eve</a>," the journal <em><a href="http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v15/n4/abs/ng0497-363.html" target="_blank" title="Evolution assumptions give mitochondrial mutation rates 20 times faster than empirical measurement">Nature</a></em>, Walt Brown's <a href="http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ320.html" target="_blank" title="Ann Gibbons, “Calibrating the Mitochondrial Clock,” Science, 1998">assessment</a>, and Real Science Radio's <a href="http://rsr.org/genomes-that-just-dont-fit">List of Genomes that Just Don't Fit</a>.)</p> <p><img alt="World map on human hands" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="192" src="http://www.myngle.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/hands_world_sm.gif" width="185" class="align-left" /><strong><a id="adam" name="adam"></a><a id="Adam" name="Adam"></a><a id="Y-Adam" name="Y-Adam"></a>Y-Chromosomal Adam (Really, Noah)</strong>: Further, scientists found the genetic evidence that the human race descended from a single man. Surprising, to evolutionists that is, the journal <em>Science</em><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/268/5214/1183.abstract" target="_blank">published</a>, "Absence of polymorphism at the ZFY locus on the human Y-chromosome." After mtEve was claimed to live about 200,000 years ago, Y-chromosomal Adam was claimed in <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/97/13/7360.full" target="_blank" title="&quot;the sampled Y chromosomes is of the order of 59,000 years which agrees closely with the estimate of Pritchard et al.&quot;">leading journals</a> to have lived 59,000 years ago. The evolutionists, with their uber-flexible story-telling scientific method, immediately went to work explaining that Y-chromosomal Adam would be far younger than mtEve <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-chromosomal_Adam#Time_frame" target="_blank" title="A man having multiple wives would deny other men the ability to reproduce">because of polygyny</a>. (But like with Eve, the circular group-think dogma went to work recalibrating based on evolutionary assumptions and by 2013, Y-chromosomal Adam was now comfortably claimed to be probably twice as old as Eve, polygamy becoming suddenly irrelevant.) The discovery of <a href="http://creation.com/y-chromosome-adam" target="_blank">Y-chromosomal Adam</a> corroborates the genetic bottleneck of the global flood because all men alive have descended from one man who lived more recently than Adam and Eve. He was Noah. (This all builds on the finding in the 1970s of evolutionist Maynard Smith and others that the human population must have passed through a period of drastically reduced size prior to the more recent rapid population increase. About this, the journal <em>Nature </em>published a letter, <a href="http://www.nature.com/search/executeSearch?sp-q-8=&amp;sp-q-6=&amp;sp-q-5=&amp;sp-q-4=&amp;sp-q-10=&amp;sp-q-3=noah%27s%20haemoglobin&amp;sp-q-2=&amp;sp-start-year=&amp;siteCode=default&amp;sp-q-12=&amp;sp-start-month=&amp;sp-q-11=&amp;sp-c=25&amp;sp-end-month=&amp;sp-advanced=true&amp;sp-m=1&amp;sp-p-3=all&amp;sp-q=noah%27s%20haemoglobin&amp;sp-p=all&amp;sp-end-year=&amp;sp-s=date_descending&amp;sp-date-range=0&amp;sp-p-2=all" target="_blank" title="Correspondence available for purchase at Nature.com">Noah's Haemoglobin</a>, from Dr. Richard N. <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v312/n5992/abs/312337a0.html" target="_blank" title="links to an example of Harkin's published work...">Harkins</a> and others from the <a href="http://www.ohsu.edu/xd/education/schools/school-of-medicine/about/history.cfm" target="_blank">Oregon Health and Science University </a>describing the "reduction in the human population to eight individuals; Noah, his wife, their three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japeth, and the sons' wives. It seems entirely plausible that this small population could be homogenous for haemoglobin genes. Thus the book of Genesis documents a series of human population changes which are consistent with changes required from consideration of amino-acid sequences alone.") As Dr. Walt Brown <a href="http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ320.html" title="See Dr. Walt Brown's analysis and references">summarizes</a> all this, "Today, the world’s population is 7 billion people. Even if many women lived 6,000 years ago, on average, each female must have had many children. Whenever the average number of children per female exceeds two, the chance of only one of these many females having continuous female descendants today becomes highly improbable. A similar unlikely event must also happen for males. Having both improbable events happen concurrently is ridiculously improbable." Most astronomers came to admit, uneasily, that the universe had a beginning (but still they reject Genesis by holding to an increasingly <a href="http://rsr.org/evidence-against-the-big-bang" title="See the many scientists who doubt the big bang and the evidence against the standard model">untenable Big Bang theory</a>. Likewise, evolutionists are acknowledging much of what the biblical creation model predicts about the human genome, while not realizing that the historic events recorded in Genesis help wonderfully to account for their data. For of course the Lord referenced "Noah" as an actual historical person (Mat. 24:37-39), and regarding Adam and Eve, Jesus Christ reminded us that, "from the beginning of the creation [not after billions of years], God made them male and female" (Mark 10:6), as "Eve... was the mother of all" (Gen. 3:20). [end <a href="#bottleneck">Canaan excerpt</a>]</p> <p><a id="bias" name="bias"></a><a id="48" name="48"></a><a id="48-chromosomes" name="48-chromosomes"></a><a id="hand-washing" name="hand-washing"></a><a id="semmelweis" name="semmelweis"></a><strong>* Science Bias and Other Fun Facts</strong>:<br /> - <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAY4zlDSYqM&amp;feature=share&amp;list=UUBhGRugWLjArGfFlKpGk9zQ" target="_blank">48 chromosomes</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignaz_Semmelweis" target="_blank">Hand Washing &amp; Semmelweis</a> are examples of extreme stubbornness and bias in science. And a post-show example is the Galileo affair in which his trouble arose from opposing the mainstream, secular, <a href="http://creation.com/the-galileo-twist" target="_blank">Aristotelian geocentrism</a>.<br /> - Stickleback fish rapidly adapted to survive in colder water but now they die more quickly, showing the survival "cost" of adaptation. And the rapidity contradicts the slow trial-and-error mutation and selection method, as with Darwin's finches. This reminds us of paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould's theory of punctuated equilibrium that claims that the <em>lack</em> of fossil evidence for evolution provides strong evidence for evolution, because it indicates that it happened so quickly, in geologic terms of course, that the strata record was unable to capture it. The <a href="https://www.jonathanpark.com/" target="_blank">Jonathan Park</a> radio drama for kids illustrates this claim by saying: "We know that elephants run through our house very quickly because we never see them."<br /> - A Darwinist professor asks, if we can't get moas right, that is, if we so misunderstand these extinct bird species from only 650 years ago, how can we get hominids right?<br /> - Beetle larvae have eight regular eyes and four eyes with simultaneous bifocal vision to see close-up prey.<br /> - Infants can't digest 20% of mom's milk, which sugary portion was designed by God as bait for germs.</p> <p><strong>* If Chimps are 95% Human, Sponges are 70%</strong>: The sequencing of the Great Barrier Reef sponge genome shows, according to the co-author's interview with AFP in <strong><em><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.164cb673ff6be58ac04d2d437af7e912.4d1&amp;show_article=1" target="_blank" title="AFP: Scientists find sea sponges share human genes; interview with study coauthor"><strong>Scientists find sea sponges share human genes</strong></a></em></strong>, "<span>that sea sponges share almost 70 percent of human genes</span>!" The study, reported in the peer-reviewed journal Nature, <em><a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100804/full/466673a.html" target="_blank" title="Search for &quot;one-third&quot; in this Nature article and see the Jan. 2011 Creation magazine">Sponge genome goes deep</a></em>, goes beyond it's factual findings of human-to-sponge overlap to speculate on a period of evolution after sponges that, "Nearly one-third of the genetic alterations that distinguish humans from their last common ancestor with single-celled organisms took place during this period."</p> <p><a href="http://KGOV.com/files/images/science/sea-sponge.jpg" title="Grandma"><img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="172" src="http://KGOV.com/files/images/science/sea-sponge.jpg" width="210" /></a></p> <p><strong>* 20,500 Human Genes; 18,000 Sponge Genes</strong>: While humans have about <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080113161406.htm" target="_blank" title="Human Gene Count Tumbles Again: reporting on a Harvard study">20,500 genes</a> and <a href="http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/faq/genenumber.shtml" target="_blank" title="From the Human Genome Project...">simple worms have 20,000</a>, it turns out that sponges, <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100804/full/466673a.html" target="_blank" title="Sponge genome goes deep">according to Nature</a>, have "more than 18,000 individual genes." Thus "the sponge genome represents a diverse toolkit." Exactly says RSR! As Nature reports, "according to Douglas Erwin, a palaeobiologist at the Smithsonian, such complexity indicates that sponges must have descended from a more advanced ancestor than previously suspected. 'This flies in the face of what we think of early metazoan evolution,' says Erwin."</p> <p><strong>So, What's This Doing In There?</strong> Nature also says about sponge DNA: "The genome also includes analogues of genes that, in organisms with a neuromuscular system, code for muscle tissue and neurons." Those Darwinists who hold to the circular logic of methodological naturalism do not have the intellectual liberty to consider that perhaps the Intelligent Designer devised a genetic toolbox from which He could pull out of the same basic blueprint tools for making sponges, kangaroos, and people.</p> <p><strong>And from Science Daily</strong>: About "the sponge, which was not recognized as an animal until the 19th century," <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100804151408.htm" target="_blank">Science Daily reports</a> that "the team looked in the sponge genome for more than 100 genes that have been implicated in human cancers and found about 90 percent of them." And from a researcher with the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research in Cambridge, Mass., "Though we think of <em>a sponge</em> as a simple creature whose skeleton we take to the bathtub, it <em>has a lot of the major biochemical and developmental pathways</em> <em>we associate with complex functions in humans</em> and other more complex animals", she said.<a href="http://KGOV.com/files/images/science/sponge.jpg" title="Grandpa"><img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="172" src="http://KGOV.com/files/images/science/sponge.jpg" width="210" /></a></p> <p><strong>* Assuming Other Genes GAINED Rather Than LOST</strong>: Why? With sponges possessing much of the genetic material needed to build the far more complex human body, Darwinists should equally consider that perhaps the remaining necessary genes were not <em>added</em> over time, but <em>lost</em>. In 600 million years surely the sponge could lose such genetic material out of disuse. As <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100804151408.htm" target="_blank">observed</a> in Science Daily, "But there are certain missing components [as compared to the human genome]. Future studies will reveal how sponges operate as bona fide animals without those components, and how the <em>addition</em> [?] of those components led to the evolution of more complex animals." If sponges, which have no muscles or nervous system, have much of the genetic material to build a neuromuscular system, then in the Darwinian timeframe they as easily could have <em>lost</em> the rest of the genes needed to build a human body. Why do evolutionists arbitrarily prefer the idea of such genes being <em>added</em> rather than <em>lost</em>? The answer to that question exposes the elephant in the room (and in the genome).</p> <p><strong>* Genes Evolved Hundreds of Millions of Years Before Explosion of Life</strong>: Evolutionists describe the "Cambrian Explosion" as the relatively rapid appearance of most of the 35 major animal groupings (called phylum). The University of California, Berkley's Bob Sander's describes the sponge study as indicating that, "<em>Essentially all the genomic innovations</em> that we deem necessary for intricate modern animal life <em>have their origins</em> much further back in time than anyone anticipated, <em>predating the Cambrian explosion by tens if not hundreds of millions of years</em>." <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100804151408.htm" target="_blank">According to Sanders</a>, that's what has been learned from the sponge genome and from co-author Bernie Degnan, professor of biology at the University of Queensland, Australia who collected the Great Barrier Reef sponge that was sequenced.</p> <p><strong>Today’s Resource</strong>: We invite you to check out the science department at <a href="http://store.kgov.com">store.kgov.com</a>.</p> <p><strong>Clarification</strong>: The audio of today's program was edited shortly after airing to present a more qualified description of the softshell turtle fossil find.</p> <p><strong>Request</strong>: Please send instances of Darwinism being squeezed by new discoveries to <a href="mailto:Bob@rsr.org">Bob@rsr.org</a>. Thanks!</p> </div> The Election, Science, and Creation https://kgov.com/election-2024 Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:00:00 -0700 7072 at https://kgov.com <div><p>* With Doug on assignment,&nbsp;<b>Ryan Williams</b>&nbsp;is back in the studio&nbsp;to talk about the recent election and the latest Creation Magazine.&nbsp;</p> <p><b>* Election Results:</b>&nbsp;Ryan and Fred each share their thoughts on the Trump victory in the recent election. Tune in to also find out what Fred and Ryan think about the question&nbsp;<i>"Does God Pick Our Leaders?"</i>, and visit BibleEvidences.com for the&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://bibleevidences.com/god-pick-leaders/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1731719816723000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2NxKXOEK9NUtTb9Vyg-5MR" href="https://bibleevidences.com/god-pick-leaders/" target="_blank">article</a>&nbsp;they discuss.&nbsp;</p> <p><b>* Parent's Monkey Business:</b>&nbsp;Tragic&nbsp;child development experiments that reveal consequences of a worldview of evolution and natural selection.&nbsp;</p> <p><b>* Dating Problems In Tibet:</b>&nbsp;No, this isn't referring to boy meets girl and a Tibetan dating app. Instead, a recent study in this country shows just how dating methods in archaeology can be unreliable and problematic.</p> <!--break--> <p><b>* Going Batty:</b>&nbsp;Bats use echolocation in fascinating ways to navigate their environment.</p> <p><b>* Avoiding Sharks:</b>&nbsp;Find out if Fred's encounter with a shark was real or imagined. Also find out about new techniques to avoid predator attacks.&nbsp;</p> <p><b>* Iron Lady Refuted:</b>&nbsp;Strong experimental evidence has knocked Mary Shweitzer's iron rescue device off the table. The&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=http://rsr.org/soft-tissue&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1731719816723000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0_vHyeUH-VffORAHt7e1SV" href="http://rsr.org/soft-tissue" target="_blank">soft tissue</a>&nbsp;discovered in dinosaurs is irrefutable&nbsp;evidence that dinosaurs are just thousands of years old and easily fit within the timeframe of the Bible.</p> <p><b>* Ryan's Brain is Worth Billions:</b>&nbsp;The complexity of the human brain continues to astonish researchers. What about Fred's brain?</p> <div class="video-embed-field-provider-youtube video-embed-field-responsive-video"><iframe width="854" height="480" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LA97GMrMkj0?autoplay=0&amp;start=0&amp;rel=0"></iframe> </div> </div> ThThurs: 1 Corinthians Pt. 15 https://kgov.com/bel/20241114 Thu, 14 Nov 2024 22:00:00 -0700 7071 at https://kgov.com <div><main role="main"> <article role="article"> <p><strong>* First Corinthians:&nbsp;</strong>Join Bob as you hear Paul demanding intolerance of sexual immorality within the church. Then ponder Paul's insistence that we judge all things, great and small. And for those who believe that Christians are no longer under the law, how do they explain Paul's command to flee immorality? Then hear the surprises that come with the New Testament's most thorough discussion of marriage and divorce, celibacy and intimacy. What caused Paul to give his converts hints on how to interact with Peter's converts? Also, considering that the Jerusalem Council explicitly reinforced the Mosaic Law's prohibition on the eating of meat sacrificed to idols, why would Paul give permission to Christians to eat a meal in a restaurant located inside an idol's temple? Finally in this material, Paul instructs his converts to win those under law, if need be, by willingly submitting to the law.&nbsp;<br /> <strong><a href="https://cdn3.bigcommerce.com/s-33mrizoy/products/338/images/766/1%252520Corinthians%252520Vol%2525201-Lg__55698.1412612170.1280.1280.jpg?c=2"><strong><img alt="What We Believe and Why We Believe It" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="306" src="https://cdn3.bigcommerce.com/s-33mrizoy/products/338/images/766/1%252520Corinthians%252520Vol%2525201-Lg__55698.1412612170.1280.1280.jpg?c=2" width="306" /></strong></a></strong><br /> For over a quarter century Bob Enyart has studied God's Word praying for the wisdom to share the truth of Scripture with a lost and dying world. Now you can benefit from this very exciting Bible study. The two Revelation albums address matters of eternal consequence head on. Before listening to these tapes, Bob strongly urges that you read The&nbsp;<strong><a href="http://store.kgov.com/the-plot/">Plot book or listen to The Plot album</a></strong>&nbsp;that will introduce you to the overview of the Bible.&nbsp;Available on&nbsp;<a href="http://store.kgov.com/revelation-vol-i-mp3-cd-or-mp3-download/">MP3-CD or download</a>.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>BEL SUBSCRIPTIONS</strong>: Please consider one of our monthly subscriptions that will not only help support BEL, but they also promote better understanding of the Bible and may equip you to more effectively reach those around you.</p> <p><a href="https://store.kgov.com/monthly-bible-study-sermon-topical-audio-and-video-downloads/" target="_blank"><strong>Monthly Audio &amp; Video&nbsp;Downloads</strong></a>: Now you can subscribe to monthly sermons, Bible studies or topical videos in download form.</p> <p><a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Sermons</strong></a>: Enjoy all of Bob's sermons from the month on&nbsp;Sermon Video DVD, great also to watch with the family. Or, get these on&nbsp;Sermon Audio CDs&nbsp;which are standard audio Compact Discs that will play on any CD player including the one in your car. Or get them on a single&nbsp;Sermon MP3-CD&nbsp;which will play on an MP3 player, in a DVD player, or in your computer.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Bible Studies</strong></a>: Enjoy the Scriptures with Bob's&nbsp;Monthly Bible Study DVDs, great too for a small group Bible study. Or get these teachings on a single&nbsp;Monthly Bible Study Audio MP3- CD which will play on an MP3 player, in a DVD player, or in your computer.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Topical Videos</strong></a>: Coming to your mailbox, you'll get a&nbsp;Monthly Topical DVD&nbsp;to enjoy one of Bob's great videos specially selected to be entertaining and to teach about life from a biblical worldview.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Best of Bob Shows</strong></a>: Every month our crew selects the eight best BEL shows of the month and for the folks who might have missed some of them, we mail them out on the&nbsp;Best of Bob MP3-CD.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly BEL TV Classics</strong></a>: Enjoy Bob Enyart's timeless, popular TV show delivered to your home on the&nbsp;Monthly BEL TV Classics DVDs&nbsp;with great audio and video clarity thanks to our state-of-the-art mastering from the studio-quality Sony beta tapes to DVD!<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Donation</strong></a>: For folks who just want to make sure that Bob Enyart Live stays on the air, please consider making a pledge in the form of a&nbsp;Monthly Donation.</p> </article> </main> <footer role="contentinfo"> <nav aria-labelledby="block-footer-menu" id="block-footer" role="navigation">&nbsp;</nav> </footer> </div> The Perfection of Life with Sal Cordova https://kgov.com/life-perfectly-designed Fri, 08 Nov 2024 22:00:00 -0700 7070 at https://kgov.com <div><p><b>*Sal Cordova:&nbsp;</b>Join&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://evolutionfairytale.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1730952286035000&amp;usg=AOvVaw20XGbEDEgDIVn2UKaPr0K4" href="https://evolutionfairytale.com/" target="_blank">Fred Williams</a>&nbsp;and co-host&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://theweeklyworldview.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1730952286035000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1izAWLNS_IYifgAAPQbiQA" href="https://theweeklyworldview.com/" target="_blank">Doug McBurn</a>ey&nbsp;as they welcome Sal Cordova, who&nbsp;recently published a paper on Structural Bioinformatics through Oxford University Press which relates to today's topic.&nbsp; Sal also published a peer-reviewed reference chapter critical of evolutionary theory through Springer-Nature. That book can be found on secular University Library shelves. He is also presently a PhD student in Bio-molecular engineering, he holds 5 science degrees including Masters in Biology and Applied Physics from Johns Hopkins University, with Undergrads in Electrical Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science.&nbsp; Previously He was a Senior Engineer and Scientist in the Aerospace and Defense Industry working for MITRE (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Research and Engineering) and Fort Belvoir Army Night Vision Labs.&nbsp; He is a graduate of Dulles Aviation Flight school and is a licensed pilot.&nbsp; Prior to all this he studied concert level classical piano.</p> <p><b>*Somebody Call Me a Doctor:&nbsp;</b>Here&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v%3DsDr6-MnOE0I%26t%3D859s&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1730952286035000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0gxSaLK0mnztaJOuMgYXL-" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDr6-MnOE0I&amp;t=859s" target="_blank">Dr. Daniel Stern&nbsp;Cardinale confirm</a>&nbsp;"atheist" Aron Ra's&nbsp;<i>confession</i>&nbsp;that evolutionary biologists are well aware of the fact that proteins&nbsp;share no common evolutionary ancestor.</p> <!--break--> <p><b>*The Nature of Things:&nbsp;</b>Hear&nbsp;how Sal Got to give his testimony&nbsp;in an issue of&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.nature.com/articles/4341062a&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1730952286035000&amp;usg=AOvVaw38rMcz6NW8M_EjcbIFAYI_" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/4341062a" target="_blank">Nature magazine</a>, and how the design evident in God's creation helped rescue his faith!</p> <p><b>*An Apostasy of Cowardice:</b>&nbsp;Sal and your hosts discuss the battle creationists, home-schoolers, (and their kids) are in! against not just the principalities and powers in the world, but the "Christian" leaders who are ashamed of the creationist truth that undergirds the Gospel!</p> <p><b>*Darwin &amp; The Problem&nbsp;of Evil:</b>&nbsp;Hear how genetic decay, information science, Shannon's noisy channel coding theorem, music and&nbsp; literature, and the observed optimization of biological performance destroy Darwinian evolutionary&nbsp;theory,&nbsp;and are all evidence for the&nbsp;truth of the fall and reveal the problem of evil&nbsp;<i>as it is being solved</i>&nbsp;by the&nbsp;creator God,&nbsp;and his Son Jesus Christ the Savior of the World.</p> <p><b>*For the Birds:&nbsp;</b>The Arctic&nbsp;Tern can fly from the North to the South Pole because they appear to sense&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/birds-quantum-entanglement/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1730952286035000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2N3akEgbKB4xPnY3EF3gao" href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/birds-quantum-entanglement/" target="_blank">quantum fluctuations</a>&nbsp;in Earth's magnetic field. When compared to radar and GPS, hear how the bird's eye view&nbsp;proves&nbsp;that man&nbsp;can do engineering&nbsp;<i>good</i>. But God can do it better,&nbsp;(even&nbsp;<i>very good</i>)!</p> <div class="video-embed-field-provider-youtube video-embed-field-responsive-video"><iframe width="854" height="480" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6llMFJ10vOU?autoplay=0&amp;start=0&amp;rel=0"></iframe> </div> </div> ThThurs: 1 Corinthians Pt. 14 https://kgov.com/bel/20241107 Thu, 07 Nov 2024 22:00:00 -0700 7069 at https://kgov.com <div><main role="main"> <article role="article"> <p><strong>* First Corinthians:&nbsp;</strong>Join Bob as you hear Paul demanding intolerance of sexual immorality within the church. Then ponder Paul's insistence that we judge all things, great and small. And for those who believe that Christians are no longer under the law, how do they explain Paul's command to flee immorality? Then hear the surprises that come with the New Testament's most thorough discussion of marriage and divorce, celibacy and intimacy. What caused Paul to give his converts hints on how to interact with Peter's converts? Also, considering that the Jerusalem Council explicitly reinforced the Mosaic Law's prohibition on the eating of meat sacrificed to idols, why would Paul give permission to Christians to eat a meal in a restaurant located inside an idol's temple? Finally in this material, Paul instructs his converts to win those under law, if need be, by willingly submitting to the law.&nbsp;<br /> <a href="https://cdn3.bigcommerce.com/s-33mrizoy/products/338/images/766/1%252520Corinthians%252520Vol%2525201-Lg__55698.1412612170.1280.1280.jpg?c=2"><strong><img alt="What We Believe and Why We Believe It" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="306" src="https://cdn3.bigcommerce.com/s-33mrizoy/products/338/images/766/1%252520Corinthians%252520Vol%2525201-Lg__55698.1412612170.1280.1280.jpg?c=2" width="306" /></strong></a><br /> For over a quarter century Bob Enyart has studied God's Word praying for the wisdom to share the truth of Scripture with a lost and dying world. Now you can benefit from this very exciting Bible study. The two Revelation albums address matters of eternal consequence head on. Before listening to these tapes, Bob strongly urges that you read The&nbsp;<strong><a href="http://store.kgov.com/the-plot/">Plot book or listen to The Plot album</a></strong>&nbsp;that will introduce you to the overview of the Bible.&nbsp;Available on&nbsp;<a href="http://store.kgov.com/revelation-vol-i-mp3-cd-or-mp3-download/">MP3-CD or download</a>.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>BEL SUBSCRIPTIONS</strong>: Please consider one of our monthly subscriptions that will not only help support BEL, but they also promote better understanding of the Bible and may equip you to more effectively reach those around you.</p> <p><a href="https://store.kgov.com/monthly-bible-study-sermon-topical-audio-and-video-downloads/" target="_blank"><strong>Monthly Audio &amp; Video&nbsp;Downloads</strong></a>: Now you can subscribe to monthly sermons, Bible studies or topical videos in download form.</p> <p><a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Sermons</strong></a>: Enjoy all of Bob's sermons from the month on&nbsp;Sermon Video DVD, great also to watch with the family. Or, get these on&nbsp;Sermon Audio CDs&nbsp;which are standard audio Compact Discs that will play on any CD player including the one in your car. Or get them on a single&nbsp;Sermon MP3-CD&nbsp;which will play on an MP3 player, in a DVD player, or in your computer.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Bible Studies</strong></a>: Enjoy the Scriptures with Bob's&nbsp;Monthly Bible Study DVDs, great too for a small group Bible study. Or get these teachings on a single&nbsp;Monthly Bible Study Audio MP3- CD which will play on an MP3 player, in a DVD player, or in your computer.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Topical Videos</strong></a>: Coming to your mailbox, you'll get a&nbsp;Monthly Topical DVD&nbsp;to enjoy one of Bob's great videos specially selected to be entertaining and to teach about life from a biblical worldview.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Best of Bob Shows</strong></a>: Every month our crew selects the eight best BEL shows of the month and for the folks who might have missed some of them, we mail them out on the&nbsp;Best of Bob MP3-CD.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly BEL TV Classics</strong></a>: Enjoy Bob Enyart's timeless, popular TV show delivered to your home on the&nbsp;Monthly BEL TV Classics DVDs&nbsp;with great audio and video clarity thanks to our state-of-the-art mastering from the studio-quality Sony beta tapes to DVD!<br /> <br /> <a href="http://store.kgov.com/monthly-subscriptions/"><strong>Monthly Donation</strong></a>: For folks who just want to make sure that Bob Enyart Live stays on the air, please consider making a pledge in the form of a&nbsp;Monthly Donation.</p> </article> </main> <footer role="contentinfo"> <nav aria-labelledby="block-footer-menu" id="block-footer" role="navigation">&nbsp;</nav> </footer> </div> What's up with the election? https://kgov.com/bel/20241105 Tue, 05 Nov 2024 22:00:00 -0700 7068 at https://kgov.com <div><p>Bob reports on the large number of contractors this week working on building exteriors&nbsp;and brings attention to one particular job site. In the second half of the program the pastor of Denver Bible Church turns to the Scriptures to see what they say&nbsp;about the election.<br /> <br /> <div class="video-filter video-youtube video-center vf-cbwshrs4n94"> <iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/CBwsHRs4n94?modestbranding=0&amp;amp;html5=1&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;autoplay=0&amp;amp;wmode=opaque&amp;amp;loop=0&amp;amp;controls=1&amp;amp;autohide=0&amp;amp;showinfo=0&amp;amp;theme=dark&amp;amp;color=red" width="400" height="400" allowfullscreen="true" frameborder="0"></iframe> </div> </p> <p>&nbsp;</p> </div>