Real Science Radio

The Election, Science, and Creation

Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:00:00 -0700

* With Doug on assignment, Ryan Williams is back in the studio to talk about the recent election and the latest Creation Magazine.

* Election Results: Ryan and Fred each share their thoughts on the Trump victory in the recent election. Tune in to also find out what Fred and Ryan think about the question "Does God Pick Our Leaders?", and visit BibleEvidences.com for the article they discuss.

* Parent's Monkey Business: Tragic child development experiments that reveal consequences of a worldview of evolution and natural selection.

* Dating Problems In Tibet: No, this isn't referring to boy meets girl and a Tibetan dating app. Instead, a recent study in this country shows just how dating methods in archaeology can be unreliable and problematic.

* Going Batty: Bats use echolocation in fascinating ways to navigate their environment.

* Avoiding Sharks: Find out if Fred's encounter with a shark was real or imagined. Also find out about new techniques to avoid predator attacks.

* Iron Lady Refuted: Strong experimental evidence has knocked Mary Shweitzer's iron rescue device off the table. The soft tissue discovered in dinosaurs is irrefutable evidence that dinosaurs are just thousands of years old and easily fit within the timeframe of the Bible.

* Ryan's Brain is Worth Billions: The complexity of the human brain continues to astonish researchers. What about Fred's brain?

The Perfection of Life with Sal Cordova

Fri, 08 Nov 2024 22:00:00 -0700

*Sal Cordova: Join Fred Williams and co-host Doug McBurney as they welcome Sal Cordova, who recently published a paper on Structural Bioinformatics through Oxford University Press which relates to today's topic. Sal also published a peer-reviewed reference chapter critical of evolutionary theory through Springer-Nature. That book can be found on secular University Library shelves. He is also presently a PhD student in Bio-molecular engineering, he holds 5 science degrees including Masters in Biology and Applied Physics from Johns Hopkins University, with Undergrads in Electrical Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science. Previously He was a Senior Engineer and Scientist in the Aerospace and Defense Industry working for MITRE (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Research and Engineering) and Fort Belvoir Army Night Vision Labs. He is a graduate of Dulles Aviation Flight school and is a licensed pilot. Prior to all this he studied concert level classical piano.

*Somebody Call Me a Doctor: Here Dr. Daniel Stern Cardinale confirm "atheist" Aron Ra's confession that evolutionary biologists are well aware of the fact that proteins share no common evolutionary ancestor.

*The Nature of Things: Hear how Sal Got to give his testimony in an issue of Nature magazine, and how the design evident in God's creation helped rescue his faith!

*An Apostasy of Cowardice: Sal and your hosts discuss the battle creationists, home-schoolers, (and their kids) are in! against not just the principalities and powers in the world, but the "Christian" leaders who are ashamed of the creationist truth that undergirds the Gospel!

*Darwin & The Problem of Evil: Hear how genetic decay, information science, Shannon's noisy channel coding theorem, music and literature, and the observed optimization of biological performance destroy Darwinian evolutionary theory, and are all evidence for the truth of the fall and reveal the problem of evil as it is being solved by the creator God, and his Son Jesus Christ the Savior of the World.

*For the Birds: The Arctic Tern can fly from the North to the South Pole because they appear to sense quantum fluctuations in Earth's magnetic field. When compared to radar and GPS, hear how the bird's eye view proves that man can do engineering good. But God can do it better, (even very good)!

After Darwin with Sal Cordova

Fri, 01 Nov 2024 21:00:00 -0600

*Peak Darwin? Listen in as Sal recounts the Richard Sternberg scandal, and quotes darwinist after darwinist acquitting Sternberg and departing from Darwin.

*Evolutionary Evangelism: Sal compares the theoretical foundations of electromagnetism with evolutionary theory, and reveals that no legitimate scientific application requires evolutionary theory to advance, (not biology, not embryology, not even underwater basket-weaving), meaning Darwinism barely qualifies as a false religion.

*Dissent from Darwin? It's not just RSR and Sal who are over the hump on "Peak Darwin" - Check out the list of Scientists Doubting Darwin!

*Have a Heart: Hear about the research and products of Dr. Robert Metheny (and others) who practice regenerative medicine from a Chriatian Creationist worldview.

IVF Science and the Bible with Tony Robinson Part II

Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:00:00 -0600

*Getting Real: With Fred Williams on assignment, RSR co-host Doug McBurney welcomes Tony Robinson, a former federal law enforcement agent, a believer, a husband, a father, and the author of “An Introduction to Biblical Jurisprudence” available on Amazon to discuss the reality of the current practice of human in-vitro-fertilization.

*Step by Step: We wrap up the step by step description of IVF from beginning to end so you can understand what's involved physically, spiritually, and legally, and make a godly decision about it.

*Turning Good Evil: Would Satan hijack God's command "be fruitful and multiply" in order to deceive you into sin? Listen in to get some biblical, scientific and legal insight!

*Sign Up: to Keep RSR on the Air! If you support us, thank you! We couldn't do it without you. It's telethon month at Real Science Radio, and we need 50 new supporters to sign up, (or existing supporters to double their support) so we can stay on the air on KLTT in Denver.We've got an exciting new announcement! With October being our telethon month, we're looking for 50 new sign-ups for Bob Enyart Subscriptions. These are the best of the best available only at ENYART.SHOP! Please do whatever you can to help us reach our telethon goal of 50 new sign-ups to keep the ministry alive and well!

IVF Science and the Bible with Tony Robinson Part I

Fri, 18 Oct 2024 21:00:00 -0600

*Step by Step: Learn a step by step description of IVF from beginning to end so you can understand what's involved physically, spiritually, and legally, and make a godly decision about it.

*Turning Good Evil: Would Satan hijack God's command "be fruitful and multiply" in order to deceive you into sin? Listen in to get some biblical, scientific and legal insight!

Refuting Professor Dave Pt IV

Fri, 11 Oct 2024 21:00:00 -0600

TELETHON MONTH: We've got an exciting new announcement! With October being our telethon month, we're looking for 50 new sign-ups for Bob Enyart Subscriptions. These are the best of the best available only at ENYART.SHOP! Please do whatever you can to help us reach our telethon goal of 50 new sign-ups to keep the ministry alive and well!

*More On Biology w/"Prof" Dave: finally this week Fred Williams and Doug McBurney offer RSR's "definitive" refutation of David James YouTube series allegedly debunking biblical creation.

*Holey Jeans: actually genes... and assumptions David James makes about their contributions to the origins of enzymes, including gene duplication and other evidence "thought to be" in support of evolutionary biology. Sal Cordova dropped the big hammer on such nonsense last May right here on RSR!

*Mutation as Design: Fred critiques the rank stupidity of asserting that genetic mutations produce lots of complex functions and that this can appear as design to the "unprepared" mind, (meaning the mind unprepared by evolutionary propaganda). Even David James' hell bound, fellow traveling, evolutionist fellows at the NIH and Nature know that gene mutations are overwhelmingly harmful!

*RNA from Nothing: Well, not exactly nothing, but David James' assertion that random DNA mutations are an ample source of functional RNA and peptides is equally absurd, and has been refuted by (among others) Rob Carter at Creation Ministries International.

*Haekel, Hox & a Million Bucks: When David "Professor Dave" James Farina condescends to defend, (and even show) Haeckel's hoax slides RSR declares an end to his career. And it's sad that it ended before he could earn the million dollars he bets against creation.

*Body Check: Find out the truth behind more of Professor Dave's "body" of claims at our Professor Dave FACT CHECK page!

Proffesor Dave Fact Check

Wed, 09 Oct 2024 14:43:22 -0600

Below is RSR's convenient Fact Checker for the many claims made by popular YouTuber "Professor" Dave in his five part series The Definitive Guide to Debunking Creationists. RSR has debunked this series with our own four part YouTube series The Debunking of Professor Dave. Dave Farina is not an actual professor, but instead a failed ex-teacher according to the Discovery Institute.

Video 1 - Cosmology/Planetary Science Video 2 - Abiogenesis Video 3 - Evolutionary Biology/ Paleontology Video 4 - Genetics/Molecular Biology Video 5 - Philosophy/Theology

Creation scientists are quite aware of the Big Bang cosmology doctrine, they simply disagree with it due to the scores of evidence that contradict the Big Bang.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/big-bang and rsr.org/big-bang-predictions

Fallacy: Misrepresentation, Strawman

No creation scientist has made this claim. Instead, they point out that retrograde planets contradict the Nebular Hypothesis, specifically due to the Conservation of Angular Momentum.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/big-bang and rsr.org/big-bang-predictions

Fallacy: Strawman

This is of course a childish claim by Farina, and ironic given that it’s creationists who have been thrilled (but not surprised) with the findings of the Hubble and now James Webb space telescopes. For example, there are massive fully formed galaxies where they aren’t supposed to be (Webb Spots Super Old, Massive Galaxies That Shouldn’t Exist). RSR has documented many more failed predictions of the Big Bang.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/big-bang-predictions

Fallacy: False caricature

Pretty much all the fine tuning arguments used by creationists come from secular scientists. For example, see Rare Earth by Ward and Brownlee.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/fine-tuning

This was not a prediction, but instead a retrodiction. A paper in Nature magazine describes the particulars of this "prediction" as, "assumed ad hoc to obtain the required [predicted] abundances". In Physics Essays, "The study of historical data shows that over the years predictions of the ratio of helium to hydrogen in a BB universe have been repeatedly adjusted to agree with the latest available estimates of that ratio as observed in the real universe."

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/big-bang-predictions

Fallacy: Cherry-picking

Claims of observed Pop 3 stars is speculation. Daniel Whalen, an astrophysicist at the University of Portsmouth, said “it’s not clean evidence” because” Other piping hot cosmic objects can produce a similar helium II signature”.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/list-of-star-formation-problems

Fallacy: Speculative evidence

Creationists have several competing theories to explain distant starlight. RSR leans toward either stretch cosmology or the plasma cosmology explanation. Note however that evolutionists also have a distant starlight problem called the "horizon problem" that forced evolutionists to posit the untenable and largely falsified inflation theory.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/starlight-and-time, rsr.org/plasma

Fallacy: Inconsistency

Professor Dave mentions zircons, but doesn’t want to tell his listeners of a huge, gigantic elephant in the room which is the fact that those zircons have helium in them. Helium is slippery and should have escaped zircons long ago. Dr Russ Humphries set up an experiment with an independent lab that confirmed their slip rate through the material, and found that the zircons were roughly 6000 years old. This is one of many indicators that point to an earth much younger than "4.54 billion years plus or minus 50 million years".

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/list-of-not-so-old-things

Fallacy: Inconsistency

RSR champions Dr. Walt Brown's compelling and evidence-based theory on the origin of radioactivity (link below). Moreover, even evolutionists know that decay rates may have been different in the past: "There has been in recent years the horrible realization that radio decay rates are not as constant as previously thought, nor are they immune to environmental influences. And this could mean that the atomic clocks are reset during some global disaster, and events which brought the Mesozoic to a close may not be 65 million years ago but, rather, within the age and memory of man." – Evolutionist Frederic B. Jueneman, FAIC, Industrial Research & Development, p.21, June 1982

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/origin-of-earths-radioactivity

Fallacy: Unwarranted assumption

In Professor Dave's illustration, he says they will ISOLATE then re-run the mutations. This is called truncation selection, something that does not happen in nature. So if they don’t isolate their enzymes, then more random mutation is going to blur the ability for natural selection to select anything of value. So what he just described is a sleight of hand, and a form of artificial selection. What does artificial selection require? Intelligence!

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/abiogenesis

Fallacy: Circular reasoning

Organic chemist Dr. Royal Truman points out that after literally thousands of carefully DESIGNED experiments, the best OOL researchers could do was produce a small peptide in a miniscule amount! Prof Dave protested to the tornado in a junkyard analogy by creationists, but that’s exactly what they are proposing, except in this case each iteration is its own small tornado. So to put it another way, its not a single tornado in a junkyard, its millions of them back-to-back over time. Dr Royal Truman also noted that OOL researchers terminate the experiment when its convenient to them, given all the chemistry working against them.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/royal-truman

Fallacy: Circular reasoning

Randomness left to itself always leads to ZERO information. What this YouTube personality isn’t telling you is that after one improbable event, you have to retain that improbable event to build on it. An analogy Bob Enyart gave is a TV set with random pixel generation. It will always look like noise. If by some fluke after trillions of years in trillions of universes it randomly creates his face, how much more is needed to show him giving a thumbs up? Before it even has a chance to do so his face would have been already scrambled in the very next frame.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/information
Fred's talk Information Theory and the Demise of Darwinism

Fallacy: Rank stupidity

Professor Dave starts his abiogenesis video with the tired claim that there is no evidence for Noah's flood. This despite overwhelming geological and historical evidence.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/flood-evidence

Fallacy: Invincible ignorance

It is true that plenty of Christians make this claim, but so do believers in evolution who are unfamiliar with the debate. Many also testify that this is what they learned in grade school (and likely by many high school teacher). We've never met any informed creationist familiar with the origins debate ever claim this.

RSR YouTube response

Fallacy: Hasty generalization

Some Christians have made claims that attribute "a cow turning into a sheep" to evolution, but never an informed creationist. Ironically, plenty of informed evolutionists claim this! In fact, it was an evolutionist scientist, Richard Goldschmidt, who proposed the “hopeful monster” hypothesis. Goldschmidt rightly noted that neo-Darwinism could only account for small-scale microevolution that no one disputes. Hence he came up with the lame idea that macromutations in the right place could yield a new species in a single generation. There are evolutionists today who still defend this idea.

RSR YouTube response

Fallacy: Hasty generalization

Farina appeals to several examples that could easily be attributed to design. Even if design was not involved, it would be akin to claiming two pieces of driftwood getting stuck together in the ocean is evidence that a yacht can form given enough time. A key missing ingredient in his just-so story is how information can arise to lead to this major event. And at what point did Eukaryotic sexual reproduction evolve? There are elaborate design mechanisms involved, such as the locking mechanism that prevents polyspermy.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/design, rsr.org/sexual-reproduction

Fallacy: Begging the question

Pakicetus is “known from a skull”, and just fragments at that. Dr Carl Werner has uncovered forged fossils, and one of the major whale proponents, Philip Gingerich now admits that Rodhocetus had no flippers and no fluked tail (and certainly no blowhole), so what millions of evolutionists believe regarding whale fossils is based on fabricated, and fully falsified, misinformation.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/whales

Fallacy: Evidentiary

Dr Carl Werner uncovered THREE frauds: 1) Donald Johanson claimed that all analysis showed that the knee joint was human. This was contradicted by Johanson's dig parter, who said it was ape. 2) Johanson hid the fact that a human skull (Laotoli fossil 18) was also found at Laotoli! 3) Johanson hid alterations to Lucy's pelvis to make it more ape-like.

If human evolution is true, 1) why resort to so many frauds? 2) why is it easy to find evolutionists who agree with many of the problems (e.g. as Lord Solly Zuckerman once quipped, "they're just bloody apes!").

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/lucy, rsr.org/ape-men

Fallacy: Evidentiary

See our shows with Dr. Carl Werner where he uncovered HUNDREDS of outright frauds!

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/ape-fraud

Fallacy: Evidentiary

Nature News & Views admits that this "icon" of evolution has been "knocked from its perch" after leading paleontologists reassessed "the creature that has been considered the evolutionary link between the two."

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/archaeopteryx

Fallacy: Evidentiary

The vast majority of documented random mutations are considered at best "near-neutral". In fact “most mutations with observable phenotypic effects are deleterious” (ref). A 2022 Nature article shows that even silent mutations are harmful!

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/bergman

Fallacy: Circular Reasoning

The vast majority of proteins and enzymes have different amino acid sequences, as the specific sequence of amino acids is what defines each unique protein and determines its function. Even slight variations in the sequence can lead to a significantly different protein structure and function. This claim gives the illusion that design is not involved and thus becomes a case of circular reasoning.

RSR YouTube response

Fallacy: Circular reasoning

What a few scientists did was insert some random RNA into the cell of an already existing gene and noticed that some gene regulation activity changed. They provided no evidence that the bioactivity improved the cell. Out of literally millions of sequences they started with, they found 700 active sequences for which roughly 150 were from the random piece. The experiment did nothing to show the evolution of functional genes. As Dr Rob Carter of CMI points out, they are playing fast and loose with the facts, and provides more fatal problems to this study.

RSR YouTube response

Fallacy: Circular reasoning

There is no tangible evidence that gene duplication has ever led to increased information in a genome. AI, which is good at searching large volumes of data, could only offer examples such as "The different globin proteins involved in oxygen transport are thought to have arisen from gene duplication events". AI also served up a common evolutionist claim that the immune system, which employs gene duplication, shows how it can happen. These are not random mutations, which are required by neo-Darwinism. Instead they clearly are designed to do this.

RSR YouTube response

Fallacy: Circular reasoning, special pleading

The only examples Farina provided were harmful mutations resulting in deformities or diseases. Also, "astounding similarities" of Hox developmental regulatory genes across the animal kingdom prompted prominent evolutionist Sean Carroll to write that, “no biologist had even the foggiest notion that such similarities could exist between genes of such different animals.”

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/shocked-evolutionists

Fallacy: Circular reasoning

Real scientists and surgeons have long said the human tail claim is a myth. According to Physician and surgeon Dr. Michael Egnor (Vice-Chairman, Department of Neurological Surgery, and Director, Pediatric Neurosurgery, at State University of New York at Stony Brook) stated the following about ‘human tails’:
“None of them—and none of the reports in the literature that I know of—are actual tails. A tail has vertebrae, is a continuation of the coccyx, has developed muscles, nerves and other soft tissues, etc. … None have the structure of a tail, even in rudimentary form, and none of the ones I have operated on were attached to the coccyx in the way that a tail is.”

RSR YouTube response

Fallacy: Circular reasoning

Back in 2014, we already knew 80% of the DNA was functional. As the Yale School of Medicine Reported, “Junk no more”. But the article rightly notes that scientists have known for decades that this so-called junk DNA played a regulatory role, and mutations in this area were traced to diseases.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/junk-dna, rsr.org/genomes-that-just-dont-fit

Fallacy: Circular reasoning

This is patently absurd. The bacterial flagellum and injectisome are two different machines that differ in both structure and function. Irreducible complexity means you can’t remove any interacting part of a system for it to remain functional. Which part is Dave Farina removing from the flagellum where it still works?

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/id

Fallacy: Invincible ignorance

This is perhaps the dumbest thing professor Dave has said. Randomness is the very opposite of information. This isn’t just common sense, it’s well-established by information science. See evolutionist Dr. Tom Schneider's simple primer here.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/information
Fred's talk Information Theory and the Demise of Darwinism

Fallacy: Invincible ignorance

This old canard of 98% similarity has been refuted for years. Dr Jeffrey Tompkins of ICR analyzed the fully sequenced data and found the difference was closer to 85%. Some years later, University of London evolutionist Richard Buggs analyzed the results of a comprehensive comparison of the new chimp genome with the human genome and posted his shocking anti-evolutionary findings. He stated, “The percentage of nucleotides in the human genome that had one-to-one exact matches in the chimpanzee genome was 84.38%.

RSR YouTube response
RSR Website: rsr.org/genomes-that-just-dont-fit
ICR: https://www.icr.org/article/human-chimp-dna-similarity-research

Fallacy: Invincible ignorance

Was Hitler religious? The Nazi leader hated Christianity as well as Judaism. - The Washington Post. Note also that Professor Dave is a communist who fails to acknowledge that the greatest mass murderers in history were communist (Stalin, Mao).

RSR YouTube response

Fallacy: Wishful thinking

Coming Soon

Fallacy: TBD

Coming Soon

Fallacy: TBD

Coming Soon

Fallacy: TBD

Coming Soon

Fallacy: TBD

Refuting Professor Dave Pt III

Fri, 04 Oct 2024 21:00:00 -0600

*More On Professor Dave: Again this week Fred Williams and Doug McBurney take on one of Youtube's deeper basement dwellers: "Professor Dave" (David James Farina) and his thinly veiled cries for momma disguised as "debunking" God's record of creation.

*Holey Cheese: Fred compares "professor" Dave's debunking tactics to a hunk of swiss cheese, full of holes, attractive to rats and mice (and the longer it sits around the stinkier it gets). Unlike his debate with James Tour, which for Christian creationists is aging quite well thank you very much.

*The Stuff of Giants: In the case of David James the stuff is straw and his straw men fall like rhetorical giants, slain by the distractional force of irrelevant assertions, (like his assertion that creationists fear telescopes).

*Elephants in the Room: Hear a point by point debunking of David James' careful "bunking" around all the elephantine facts that falsify his big bang, evolutionary naturalistic worldview, (like the growing mountain of evidence against the Big Bang being accumulated just by the Hubble, JWST, & Planck telescopes)!

Refuting Professor Dave Pt II

Fri, 27 Sep 2024 21:00:00 -0600

The Stuff of Giants: In the case of David James the stuff is straw and his straw men fall like rhetorical giants, slain by the distractional force of irrelevant assertions, (like his assertion that creationists fear telescopes).

Refuting Professor Dave Pt I

Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:00:00 -0600

*One Last Refrain: (Well maybe three to five), because this week Fred Williams and Doug McBurney take on one of Youtube's deeper basement dwellers: "Professor Dave" (David James Farina) and his thinly veiled cries for momma disguised as "debunking" God's record of creation.

*A Scale of Dumb to Dave: Doug asks why "theistic" and "deistic evolution" rate higher than Intelligent Design on Dave's spectrum from least to most "scientific", (which are really listed from least to most "secular"), except for David's odd conjunction of Flat Earth and geocentrism, (as if the two cannot be considered separately).

Real Science Radio

The Election, Science, and Creation

The Perfection of Life with Sal Cordova

After Darwin with Sal Cordova

IVF Science and the Bible with Tony Robinson Part II

IVF Science and the Bible with Tony Robinson Part I

Refuting Professor Dave Pt IV

Proffesor Dave Fact Check

Creationists deny Big Bang cosmology because they do not understand it FALSE

Creationists claim that Venus' retrograde orbit originated with the Big Bang FALSE

Creationists are adverse to looking through telescopes FALSE

The fine tuning argument of the universe is overblown by creationists FALSE

The hydrogen to helium ratio in the universe was correctly predicted by the Big Bang theory FALSE

Population 3 stars have been observed, confirming a Big Bang cosmology FALSE

Distant starlight is a problem for creationists TRUE

The age of the earth of 4.54 billion years is well-substantiated FALSE

Claims of radiometric decay rate changes in the past are "totally baseless" FALSE

Life can arise exclusively by mutation and selection FALSE

Lab experiments support origin-of-life hypothesis FALSE

Randomness given enough time will create something with "near certainty" FALSE

There is no evidence of a global flood FALSE

Christians misunderstand evolution when they ask why we still have monkeys if we evolved from them TRUE

Christians wrongly claim the evolution says that an animal can suddenly morph into another animal MISLEADING

Multicellularity (Endosymbiosis) corroborates the evolution of single cell organisms to multi celled organisms FALSE

The transitional morphology (evolution) of whales is “immaculate” FALSE

The Lucy fossil proved she was bipedal FALSE

Piltdown man is a singular incident of fraud FALSE

Archaeopteryx is a good transitional example of dinos to birds FALSE

We tend to observe primarily beneficial mutations FALSE

The majority of amino acids sequences could be completely different and the function would be identical or similar MISLEADING

Totally random sequences are an abundant source of bioactive RNA and peptides FALSE

There is substantial evidence that new novel genes originated by gene duplication over time FALSE

Mutations to Hox genes provide dramatic opportunity to evolve new body plans FALSE

Humans have a embryonic vestigial tail FALSE

90% of the genome is "junk DNA" FALSE

The bacteria flagellum has an injectisome, refuting irreducible complexity FALSE

Random sequences regularly and rapidly evolve function via selection FALSE

Humans and chimps share 98.8% DNA similarity FALSE

Hitler was a Christian who opposed evolution FALSE

Coming Soon

Coming Soon

Coming Soon

Coming Soon

Refuting Professor Dave Pt III

Refuting Professor Dave Pt II

Refuting Professor Dave Pt I